LLM-enhanced automatic curriculum learning (LEACL), a framework that integrates LLMs and ACL to address limitations of ACL, is proposed, which achieves better asymptotic performance in terms of the success rates compared to human-designed dense rewards.
Abstract
Long-horizon manipulation tasks pose significant challenges for reinforcement learning due to sparse reward signals and long horizons. Automatic curriculum learning (ACL) has been proposed to tackle these challenges by progressively training agents on a sequence of tasks, from easier to more difficult. However, the success of ACL depends heavily on task-dependent specifications-such as well-defined task parameter spaces and difficulty measures-which are often manually crafted and difficult to generalize across diverse tasks. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) offer a promising alternative by enabling the decomposition of complex tasks into meaningful subtasks using the LLMs'web-scale common-sense knowledge. This decomposition can provide a natural curriculum structure for efficient learning of long-horizon tasks. However, existing LLM-based methods typically rely on hand-designed dense reward functions to learn each subtask, which can introduce bias and still requires significant human supervision. In this work, we propose LLM-enhanced automatic curriculum learning (LEACL), a framework that integrates LLMs and ACL to address these limitations. Specifically, LLMs are used to both decompose tasks into subtasks and to generate task-dependent specifications for each subtask. These specifications are then used by ACL algorithms to guide learning using only sparse reward signals, eliminating the need for dense reward design. We evaluate LEACL on five long-horizon manipulation tasks from the LIBERO benchmark. LEACL achieves better asymptotic performance in terms of the success rates compared to human-designed dense rewards.
PAC, a Progress-Augmented Advantage Curriculum for multi-task RL of LLMs that combines two task-level signals: advantage-derived learnability, which measures the magnitude of the policy update a task can induce, and recent reward gains, which show whether those updates have improved task performance.
Yuan-Qiang Yu, Yan-Zhao Zheng, Zhen-Tao Zhang et al.· 0 citations
Desc descriptive evidence is provided that long-horizon multi-tool post-training can change ways of working that transfer beyond its training domain, and both software-engineering benchmarks improve despite the training collection containing no software-engineering tasks.
Sushant Mehta, Logan Ritchie, Liudas Panavas et al.· 0 citations
T1, a Mixture-of-Experts model of 122B total trained with reinforcement learning, operating a real shell in a cloud sandbox for up to 300+ tool-call turns per task, rewarded by executing each task's own verifier by executing each task's own verifier.
Jun-Yao Yang, Yu-Cheng Shi, Zhong-Zhi Li et al.· 1 citation
Current paradigms for training language models via reinforcement learning rely heavily on sparse outcome rewards. However, as we pursue tasks that require longer and more complicated trajectories, such strategies result in slow learning. Prior work has attempted to address this problem by rewarding partial progress; ho...
Preston Fu, Kevin Frans, Oleh Rybkin et al.· 0 citations
A systematic literature review on how RL are adapted and scaled as a fundamental post-training tools and how innovations in the RL pipeline enhance the domain-specific LLMs is conducted.
Qianyue Hao, Lin Chen, Xiao-Qian Qi et al.· ACM Computing Surveys· 1 citation
This work proposes QWM, a framework that leverages world models to perform test-time search over imagined trajectories on top of Q-learning to select high-value actions during both online rollouts and evaluation, and significantly outperforms strong prior state-of-the-art methods on both sample efficiency and performan...
Perry Dong, Yue-Ru Jia, Chelsea Finn et al.· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.