Artificial intelligence (AI) has been transforming many aspects of medical care. In prostate cancer, ongoing progress in AI has improved research and patient care. Recent advances in machine learning and deep learning have produced tools that help diagnose cancer, assess risk, and predict outcomes. In screening, AI-based risk calculators improve detection and help avoid unnecessary biopsies. Deep learning algorithms, particularly convolutional neural networks, have demonstrated expert-level performance in pathology, identifying malignancy and assigning Gleason grades with high accuracy. These tools also streamline workflow, flagging challenging cases for review and quantifying prognostic markers, such as Ki-67 and cribriform patterns. In addition, AI-based models can predict molecular alterations, microsatellite instability, and lymph node metastasis directly from histology images, providing cost-effective alternatives to traditional assays. The development of multimodal models integrates digital pathology and clinical parameters, enabling personalized treatment recommendations and improved outcome prediction. Natural language processing and large language models further expand AI's potential, facilitating information extraction from clinical notes and enhancing patient education. Despite these advances, most studies remain retrospective with heterogeneous endpoints. Performance often drops when models are tested at new sites because of differences in patient populations and slide preparation. Access to large, well-annotated datasets is limited, and technical variation hampers reproducibility. To move toward clinical use, the field needs prospective, multicenter validation, preanalytical and analytical standardization, and clear reporting of failure modes and human oversight. Emerging approaches, including self-supervised pretraining, transformer-based image models, and language-vision systems, are likely to improve generalization and support more personalized care.
GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations of such models.
Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al.· arXiv.org· 216 citations· ⚡17
The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.
Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· IEEE Transactions on Softwar...· 178 citations· ⚡14
Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.
M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· e-Informatica Software Engin...· 157 citations· ⚡17
This work investigates the possibilities of using LLMs in a resume screening setting via a document retrieval framework that simulates job candidate selection and finds that the MTEs are biased, significantly favoring White-associated names in 85% of cases and female-associated names in only 11.1% of cases.
This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.
Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 127 citations· ⚡15
The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.
Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 111 citations· ⚡8