Abstract Separating overlapping talkers and suppressing non-stationary noise are coupled problems, yet conventional pipelines solve them in isolation, so separation artifacts propagate untouched into the denoising stage. We therefore build a time–frequency joint separation–denoising network: a learnable encoder, a multi-scale dilated separator carrying channel and time–frequency attention, a per-stream noise-suppression module conditioned on the shared encoding, and an inverse-transform reconstructor, all reading one representation and trained end to end. A three-term objective binds scale-invariant signal-to-noise ratio, spectral magnitude and perceptual weighting, and training spans input signal-to-noise ratios down to − 5 dB. Evaluation draws on LibriMix, WHAM! and WHAMR! for separation, VoiceBank-DEMAND and MUSAN for noise, and MUSDB18-HQ for a full-band check outside speech. Against seven baselines retrained under an identical recipe, with every difference tested on 3000 mixtures across three seeds, the model reached 15.60 ± 0.10 dB SI-SNR improvement, 3.02 PESQ and 0.917 STOI at 0 dB with 3.9 million parameters. It surpassed Conv-TasNet, DPRNN, SepFormer, a diffusion-based cascade and a serial separate-then-denoise pipeline; TF-GridNet and MossFormer2 scored 0.50 to 0.80 dB higher at seven to eleven times the arithmetic cost, so the contribution is accuracy per unit of computation rather than absolute accuracy. Cost measurements report 6.8 G multiply–accumulate operations per second of audio, a real-time factor of 0.51 on a single CPU core and 0.41 J per second of processed audio, and a causal variant suited to streaming gives up 1.70 dB. Ablation separates the two attention paths, at 4.50% and 7.10%, from the joint denoising route at 10.30%. Cross-corpus, unseen-language and reverberant tests bound generalization: transfer costs 0.70 to 2.20 dB, and improvement falls to 7.80 dB once reverberation time exceeds 0.90 s. Code, configurations and per-utterance records accompany the article.
The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.
Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· IEEE Transactions on Softwar...· 178 citations· ⚡14
Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.
M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· e-Informatica Software Engin...· 157 citations· ⚡17
This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.
Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 127 citations· ⚡15
The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.
Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 111 citations· ⚡8
This study investigates how Lean internal startup facilitates software product innovation in large companies and identifies its enablers and inhibitors, and shows the potential of the method-in-action framework to investigate the Lean startup approach in non-startup context.
Henry Edison, Nina M. Smørsgård, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 78 citations· ⚡6
The application of agile software methods and more recently the integration of Lean practices contribute to the trend of continuous improvement in the software industry. One such area warranting proper empirical evidence is a project’s operational efficiency when using the Kanban method. This short paper takes a new an...
Marko Ikonen, Petri Kettunen, Nilay V. Oza et al.· EUROMICRO Conference on Soft...· 67 citations· ⚡9