Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Abstract
Abstract The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and large language models into healthcare is reshaping quality improvement (QI), creating unprecedented opportunities while introducing new risks that require dedicated governance frameworks and professional competencies. AI-enabled QI has significant implications for laboratory medicine across four key domains: healthcare delivery, problem definition and prioritization, intervention design, and quality control and governance. AI is expected to transform healthcare delivery by integrating fragmented data systems across clinical, pathological, radiological, and pharmacy settings, while incorporating patient-generated information and supporting care beyond traditional healthcare facilities. Within QI, AI’s greatest contribution lies in its ability to characterize system-level problems with greater precision than conventional approaches, drawing on unstructured patient feedback, electronic health records, and comparisons between individual clinical histories and evidence-based guidelines. AI also functions as a QI intervention itself by supporting clinical decision-making, enabling risk prediction, and facilitating continuous guideline monitoring. At the same time, current competencies often lag behind technological capabilities. Emerging failure modes, including algorithmic drift, hallucinations, and unintended consequences resulting from interactions among disparate datasets, necessitate robust governance structures and advanced surveillance mechanisms that remain insufficiently developed. Laboratory professionals play a critical role in this evolving landscape by ensuring the integrity of data used to train and inform AI systems, characterizing relationships between laboratory and other clinical data sources, and implementing quality surveillance processes that safeguard patients from AI misapplication.
The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.
Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· IEEE Transactions on Softwar...· 178 citations· ⚡14
Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.
M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· e-Informatica Software Engin...· 157 citations· ⚡17
This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.
Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 127 citations· ⚡15
The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.
Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 111 citations· ⚡8
The ongoing work building a Raspberry Pi cluster consisting of 300 nodes is presented, with potential use cases being an inexpensive and green test bed for cloud computing research and a robust and mobile data center for operating in adverse environments.
P. Abrahamsson, S. Helmer, Nattakarn Phaphoom et al.· IEEE International Conferenc...· 110 citations· ⚡7
The results indicate that software developers are a slightly happy population, but the need for limiting the unhappiness of developers remains, and 219 factors representing causes of unhappiness while developing software are identified.
D. Graziotin, Fabian Fagerholm, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· International Conference on...· 84 citations· ⚡6
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 8, 2026