Sep 2026· Journal of Cancer· Vol 17, pp. 1720 - 1732· 0 citations· 87 references
Medicine
TL;DR
The biological rationale, reprogramming methodology, and diagnostic potential of urine-derived iPSCs (UDiPSCs) in the context of BLCA detection and monitoring are reviewed and a tiered strategy in which methylation is assessed in parental urinary cells, genomic variants in reprogrammed clones, and transcriptional phenotypes in differentiated derivatives is proposed.
Abstract
Bladder cancer (BLCA) remains one of the most prevalent and costly malignancies worldwide, largely owing to its high recurrence rate and the invasive nature of conventional surveillance modalities. Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) technology offers a new framework for disease modeling and, potentially, precision diagnostics. Urine provides a non-invasive, renewable source of exfoliated urothelial and renal epithelial cells amenable to direct reprogramming. Here, we review the biological rationale, reprogramming methodology, and diagnostic potential of urine-derived iPSCs (UDiPSCs) in the context of BLCA detection and monitoring. We further discuss the genomic fidelity of UDiPSCs, the extent to which they may retain patient-relevant oncogenic features, their integration with multi-omics platforms, and the translational challenges that must be resolved before clinical deployment. Because reprogramming resets the somatic epigenome and transcriptome, we propose a tiered strategy in which methylation is assessed in parental urinary cells, genomic variants in reprogrammed clones, and transcriptional phenotypes in differentiated derivatives. Compared with urinary tumor DNA methylation panels and urine-derived tumor organoids, which currently exceed cell-based reprogramming approaches in accuracy, cost-effectiveness, and turnaround, UDiPSCs offer a distinct niche: interrogating rare, non-tumorigenic, field-altered urothelial cells that are diluted in bulk urinary DNA and do not form organoids. Collectively, UDiPSC-based platforms provide a plausible route toward non-invasive, personalized BLCA biomarkers, although clinical utility remains to be established through prospective validation.
Onco-fetal reprogramming of the tumor ecosystem induces fetal-like characteristics, leading to tumor growth and malignant progression. Here, we develop a robust computational pipeline to systematically identify onco-fetal (OF) cells, using single-cell transcriptomic data from corresponding fetal and tumor tissues acros...
Yong-Le Xu, Shao-Yi Chen, Zheng-Lin Lu et al.· Genome Research· 0 citations
Patient-derived organoids (PDOs) are widely used platforms for cancer modeling and precision oncology because they preserve patient-specific genetic backgrounds, recapitulate aspects of native tissue architecture, and allow long-term expansion, repeated functional interrogation, and drug screening. Accordingly, multi-o...
J. Lim, Yeju Kim, Jin-Ku Lee· Organoid· 0 citations
Bladder cancer (BC), as the most common form of urothelial carcinoma, represents a substantial global health burden owing to its high rates of late diagnosis and disease recurrence. Current standard diagnostics, such as cystoscopy and tissue biopsy, are invasive, costly, and limited in capturing tumor heterogeneity or...
Can Chen, Yu-Ze Yang, Zhou-Hui Chen et al.· Journal of Translational Med...· 0 citations
Single-cell transcriptomics of publicly available BLCA data identifies two transcriptionally distinct fibroblast states in adjacent tissue and supports an exploratory ligand–receptor interaction framework, warranting prospective validation with primary CAF populations and adequately powered multi-specimen cohorts.
Yan-Dong He, Wen-Long Lu, Guan-Qun Ju et al.· Frontiers in Cell and Develo...· 0 citations
It is demonstrated that correction of BCOR mutation by CRISPR–Cas9 only partially restores the wildtype molecular state, highlighting the importance of early detection and monitoring of adaptive mutations in hiPSC cultures.
C. Badja, S. Boushaki, Yogesh Kumar et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
The conceptual boundaries and operational criteria for identifying OnF in CRC are discussed, its regulatory mechanisms, plasticity-associated phenotypes, and translational relevance are examined, and the importance of distinguishing direct evidence of OnF from evidence of related plasticity mechanisms is emphasized.
Hao-Yu Wang, Song-Hao Liu, Ming-Xuan Zhang et al.· Frontiers in Oncology· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.