This work presents Veritas++, a perception-enhanced reasoning framework that establishes reliable perception as the foundation of authenticity reasoning, and introduces Value-aware On-Policy Distillation (VaOPD), an adaptive distillation mechanism that prioritizes high-value distillation signals over uniform supervision, internalizing perception-aware reasoning through a privileged self-teacher.
Abstract
The growing capability of image generation models has made synthetic images a routine presence in open media, making robust and generalizable AI-Generated Image (AIGI) detection increasingly essential. While multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) offer a transparent alternative to black-box binary scoring, we observe that current MLLM-based detectors still exhibit notable perception bottlenecks in capturing fine-grained anomalies. They primarily focus on how visual evidence is organized and synthesized, leaving the intrinsic perception less optimized. To mitigate this gap, we present Veritas++, a perception-enhanced reasoning framework that establishes reliable perception as the foundation of authenticity reasoning. Rather than directly optimizing the model's explanatory ability, we ground AIGI detection on three basic perception abilities, i.e., capturing fine-grained visual details, semantic anomalies and pixel-level differences. Building on this insight, we introduce Perception-oriented Learning (PoRL), which replaces open-ended description supervision with verifiable rewards to explicitly strengthen these capacities. To further integrate enhanced perception with reasoning, we introduce Value-aware On-Policy Distillation (VaOPD), an adaptive distillation mechanism that prioritizes high-value distillation signals over uniform supervision, internalizing perception-aware reasoning through a privileged self-teacher. Extensive experiments across standard, in-the-wild and emerging benchmarks demonstrate that Veritas++ achieves promising generalization. The perception learning effectively bridges the perception gap and yields seamless gains on detection, while VaOPD further enables efficient capability evolvement without sacrificing existing performance. Code and checkpoints are available at https://github.com/EricTan7/VeritasPP.
Across cross-generator, post-processing, and in-the-wild benchmarks, PE-SPC surpasses the previous DINOv3 baseline and achieves new state-of-the-art results.
Wei-Han Cai, Hao Tan, Zichang Tan et al.· 0 citations
This work investigates whether VLMs can be trained to reason about AI-generated image edits using reinforcement learning (RL) rather than explicit reasoning supervision, and introduces effective intersection over union (eff-IoU), a unified metric to jointly evaluate detection and localization.
Darsha Udayanga, Pin-Yu Chen, Payel Das et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
Large vision-language models (LVLMs) have recently shown strong potential for industrial anomaly detection (IAD) by providing image-level anomaly judgments and interpretable defect reasoning. However, current LVLM-based IAD methods still struggle to produce precise pixel-level anomaly maps from generated language judgments. We aim to achieve precise pixel-level localization while using language as guidance rather than letting it dominate the visual response. Specifically, we propose \textbf{OPD-IAD}, an evidence-privileged dense on-policy self-distillation framework for LVLM-based IAD. OPD-IAD distills privileged defect evidence onto the model's own on-policy judgment trajectory, enabling the final generated judgment to be learned under dense supervision rather than treated only as a textual answer. The resulting judgment serves as a semantic condition for dense anomaly perception. To turn this condition into dense visual evidence, we introduce \textbf{Language-guided Visual Anchoring}, which uses a judgment reforward to re-encode the image and question under the final-judgment condition into semantic anchors and contrasts them with dense visual features through a contrastive heatmap head to generate anomaly maps. The language judgment therefore provides compact semantic guidance, while dense visual features remain the basis for pixel-level scoring, allowing language to guide anomaly localization without letting language quality directly dictate the pixel-level response. Extensive experiments show that OPD-IAD achieves the best overall performance among LVLM-based IAD methods, leading on most image-level, pixel-level, and QA metrics.
Shuimu Chen, Jing Jin, Nan Su et al.· arXiv.org· 1 citation
Vision-language models (VLMs) have made rapid progress in visual perception and increasingly support real-world tasks that depend on images. Many such tasks, however, require more than rec- ognizing what an image contains: a model must use visual evidence to make a complete decision whose parts jointly satisfy global constraints. We introduce COMPLEXITYWORLD, a benchmark of 390 tasks across 39 domain-inspired visual worlds and 29 decision categories. Each task is generated from a hidden structured specification, rendered as a visual scene, and scored by an exe- cutable verifier that accepts any feasible solution. Under direct inference, all evaluated models ex- cept GPT-5.6-Sol remain below 40% verifier ac- ceptance rate (VAR), while GPT-5.6-Sol reaches 75.6%. Performance improves substantially when the same decision information is made explicit in structured form, yet varies sharply across equiva- lent visual presentations. Agent scaffolds provide smaller, model-dependent gains. Together, these results reveal a persistent visual-to-decision bot- tleneck that additional inference alone does not remove.
Industrial anomaly detection is a critical component of modern manufacturing. Most traditional unsupervised methods rely on modelling normal feature distributions, inherently limiting generalization to unknown categories. To improve generalizability, some recent methods incorporate vision-language models (VLMs) for zero-shot detection via text prompts. However, we observe that reasoning-oriented post-training can cause anomaly discrimination to collapse, with some fine-tuned models performing worse than their base VLMs. Existing methods also provide only textual decisions or coarse boxes, without pixel-level segmentation. A more explicit detection principle comes from human inspection: anomalies are identified by comparing a query image with a defect-free reference. Inspired by this, we propose InspectorGPT, a VLM framework centered on comparative reasoning. Given a normal reference and a query image, InspectorGPT compares them to identify discrepancies and perform multiple inspection tasks with detailed reasoning. We internalize this capability through Chain-of-Thought (CoT) fine-tuning and Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) with tailored, verifiable rewards. We further introduce InspectorGPT-Seg for pixel-level anomaly masks. Segmentation supervision improves anomaly discrimination but weakens semantic reasoning, while joint training fails to balance them. We therefore train the two branches separately and combine them through task-vector fusion. Extensive experiments demonstrate superior multi-dimensional performance and generalization to unseen benchmarks, validating comparative reasoning for comprehensive industrial inspection.
Weifeng Chen, Hong-Hao Zhang, Zhiyuan You et al.· 0 citations
Vision Language Models (VLMs) are well known for hallucinating non-existent objects in images. Objects with missing parts present a unique challenge for VLMs, stemming from both real-world knowledge bias and the scarcity of such images in training data. We present MissingBench-Verified, a benchmark designed to evaluate a specific and practically relevant scenario: when vision-language models fail to recognize that an essential component of an object has been removed. Across ten leading models, we observe consistent and significant failure rates that persist even when external tool evidence explicitly contradicts the model's visual perception. We further ask whether granting models access to image processing tools (e.g., cropping, contrast adjustment) enables autonomous inspection to resolve these failures. We find that existing mitigation strategies, including tool-assisted verification, autonomous visual reasoning, longer reasoning durations, and fine-tuning on an easier dataset, provide negligible improvement, indicating that this failure mode cannot be addressed through current prompting or post-hoc correction techniques. Our findings highlight a fundamental limitation of current VLM for inspection and monitoring tasks and underscore the need for architectural or training-level interventions that enable models to override internal expectations when confronted with contradictory evidence.
W. Guo, Qi Qian, Shiyu Zhou et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
