Skip to content

OPD-IAD: From Language Judgment to Industrial Anomaly Detection via On-Policy Self-Distillation

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.18850 · 1 citation · 45 references
Computer Science

Abstract

Large vision-language models (LVLMs) have recently shown strong potential for industrial anomaly detection (IAD) by providing image-level anomaly judgments and interpretable defect reasoning. However, current LVLM-based IAD methods still struggle to produce precise pixel-level anomaly maps from generated language judgments. We aim to achieve precise pixel-level localization while using language as guidance rather than letting it dominate the visual response. Specifically, we propose \textbf{OPD-IAD}, an evidence-privileged dense on-policy self-distillation framework for LVLM-based IAD. OPD-IAD distills privileged defect evidence onto the model's own on-policy judgment trajectory, enabling the final generated judgment to be learned under dense supervision rather than treated only as a textual answer. The resulting judgment serves as a semantic condition for dense anomaly perception. To turn this condition into dense visual evidence, we introduce \textbf{Language-guided Visual Anchoring}, which uses a judgment reforward to re-encode the image and question under the final-judgment condition into semantic anchors and contrasts them with dense visual features through a contrastive heatmap head to generate anomaly maps. The language judgment therefore provides compact semantic guidance, while dense visual features remain the basis for pixel-level scoring, allowing language to guide anomaly localization without letting language quality directly dictate the pixel-level response. Extensive experiments show that OPD-IAD achieves the best overall performance among LVLM-based IAD methods, leading on most image-level, pixel-level, and QA metrics.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Sep 2026

What Shared Prefixes Hide: Trajectory Dropout for On-Policy Distillation

Trajectory Dropout provides a simple mechanism for strengthening token-level supervision across model scales and OPD objectives and consistently improves average performance across teacher--student model pairs of different scales and six mathematical reasoning benchmarks.

Zi-Zhuo Lin, Quan-Ling Liu, Yi Yang et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Oct 2026

DiffGate: Difficulty-Gated Teacher Guidance for On-Policy Distillation

DiffGate is introduced, an outcome-gated objective that combines GRPO with selective, bounded teacher guidance, and improves pass@8 across all four model--domain settings, demonstrating improved solution coverage under the evaluation protocol.

Karn Tiwari, V. Chordia, P. PrathoshA · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

Dense Is Not Enough: Hierarchical Supervision Allocation for Long-Horizon On-Policy Distillation

This work forms long-horizon OPD as hierarchical supervision allocation as well as a coarse-to-fine framework that organizes supervision through Locate, Validate, and Refine and suggests that effective long-horizon distillation requires teaching at the right depth, the right decision, and the right token.

Yu-Hao Sun, Bin-Rui Wu, Zhuo-Er Xu et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 28, 2026

Making machines that can listen

Professor Paris Smaragdis develops computers with superhuman hearing for applications like speech recognition, music understanding, and environmental monitoring.

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.