This work introduces Autogenic network management, a reference architecture that extends agentic capabilities with self-programming, self reflection, self reflection, self-orienting, and self-architecting capabilities, and concludes with a research roadmap outlining the technical advances needed to make autogenic network management realistic in future 6G networks.
Abstract
Standards bodies, including TM Forum, 3GPP, and ETSI, are converging on Agentic AI as the foundation for next-generation network management, where Large AI Model (LAM)-based agents autonomously interpret intent, coordinate resources, and adapt operational behaviors at runtime. However, achieving this vision at the scale and complexity of 6G networks requires management systems that can generate and evolve their own automation software during operation. We introduce Autogenic network management, a reference architecture that extends agentic capabilities with self-programming, self reflection, self-orienting, and self-architecting capabilities. The architecture supports practical staged deployment beginning with human-supervised LAM-based agents and progressing toward autonomous operation as confidence builds. We demonstrate the approach through high-priority operator scenarios drawn from TM Forum's autonomous network use cases, showing how autogenic management addresses real operational challenges. We conclude with a research roadmap outlining the technical advances needed to make autogenic network management realistic in future 6G networks.
A two-part tutorial-and-survey is presented that formalises the control, management, and AI-native planes of 5G and 6G, and maps agentic capabilities onto 5G/6G control surfaces, standardization, and major 6G initiatives.
The evolution towards 6G edge-cloud ecosystems demands autonomous, intent-based network management to handle unprecedented infrastructure complexity. While Large Language Models offer promising capabilities for translating high-level user intents into network configurations, current monolithic approaches suffer from co...
Raffaele Di Tommaso, G. Davoli, Pietro Spadaccino et al.· IEEE Conference on Network S...· 0 citations
Experimental results show that the proposed self-calibrating agentic framework successfully profiles the zero-knowledge workloads, achieving a higher accuracy than baseline LLM agents and establishing a robust foundation for deploying autonomous AI in decentralized infrastructures.
Fin Gentzen, Marla Grunewald, Iulisloi Zacarias et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
Agentic AI is emerging as a promising paradigm for network management, enabling high-level intent processing, automated decision making, and closed-loop control. However, the current landscape is fragmented: proposed solutions are often evaluated in ad hoc settings, with limited reproducibility and no common basis for...
Stefano Salsano, A. Mayer, Lorenzo Bracciale et al.· La Main· 0 citations
The 6G era introduces unprecedented complexity in managing heterogeneous, large-scale, and dynamic network infrastructures. These challenges are addressed by the concept of Intent-Based Networking (IBN), which has emerged as a promising paradigm for autonomous network management, enabling users to express high-level ob...
A unified, taxonomy-driven, and deployment-oriented survey of agentic AI systems, synthesizing recent advances through a modular reference architecture and a four-dimensional taxonomy that characterizes agents along the axes of autonomy, tool use, collaboration, and safety–governance is presented.
Sparsh Bajoria, Shreyanshu Ranjan, Adhitya M et al.· Cognitive Computation· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.