Oct 2026· Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Topic ModelingSemantic Web and Ontologies
Abstract
CORE-LLM-Bench is a controlled neurosymbolic benchmark for evaluating ontology-grounded reasoning in large language models. Version 1.1.1 is a corrective release that supersedes v1.1.0 for future use. It contains 9,048 unique question-hop instances: 6,032 binary question-answering (BQA) instances and 3,016 open-ended question-answering (OEQA) instances. This release corrects source IRIs, completes the OEQA entailment sets, replaces 67 affected FALSE BQA pair members, corrects natural-language identity and namespace annotations, and repairs proof and complexity metadata. The frozen evaluation contains 81,432 accepted observations. Of these, 64,974 validated observations were reused and 16,458 correction-affected evaluation cells were rerun through 16,443 deduplicated paid requests. Model predictions were not manually edited. Reused observations include 15,855 qualified non-exact-prompt natural-language transfers, documented in the release provenance. The complete Zenodo archive includes benchmark JSONs, the canonical corrected Parquet dataset, frozen model responses and predictions, correction provenance, per-observation evaluation outputs, validation and audit material, and release documentation. Source code and the lean reproducibility release are available from GitHub:https://github.com/jloe2911/CORE-LLM-Bench/releases/tag/v1.1.1 The canonical Hugging Face dataset revision is:https://huggingface.co/datasets/jloe2911/CORE-LLM-Bench/tree/v1.1.1 Licensing is component-specific. Repository software is MIT licensed; separable original CORE-LLM-Bench benchmark content is CC BY 4.0; Pizza-derived material follows CC BY 3.0; OWL2Bench-derived material follows Apache-2.0; and Family/FHKB-derived material follows CC BY-SA 3.0. See NOTICE.md for detailed provenance, attribution, and modification information.
The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.
Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· IEEE Transactions on Softwar...· 178 citations· ⚡14
Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.
M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· e-Informatica Software Engin...· 157 citations· ⚡17
This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.
Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 127 citations· ⚡15
The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.
Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 111 citations· ⚡8
The ongoing work building a Raspberry Pi cluster consisting of 300 nodes is presented, with potential use cases being an inexpensive and green test bed for cloud computing research and a robust and mobile data center for operating in adverse environments.
P. Abrahamsson, S. Helmer, Nattakarn Phaphoom et al.· IEEE International Conferenc...· 110 citations· ⚡7
The results indicate that software developers are a slightly happy population, but the need for limiting the unhappiness of developers remains, and 219 factors representing causes of unhappiness while developing software are identified.
D. Graziotin, Fabian Fagerholm, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· International Conference on...· 84 citations· ⚡6
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 8, 2026