This review summarizes how AI is reshaping neoantigen discovery, from somatic variant calling, HLA typing, and peptide processing to peptide–MHC binding, presentation, and T cell recognition, and demonstrates that integrating features of antigen processing, presentation, and TCR recognition can eliminate the majority of non-immunogenic candidates while retaining clinically relevant neoepitopes.
Abstract
Neoantigens—tumor-specific peptides generated by somatic mutations—are central targets of effective anticancer T cell immunity and underpin the clinical success of immune checkpoint blockade and personalized cancer vaccines. Advances in high-throughput sequencing, immunopeptidomics, and artificial intelligence (AI) have transformed neoantigen discovery from tailored experimental workflows into scalable, computational pipelines. However, accurately identifying the small subset of tumor mutations that yield processed, presented, and immunogenic epitopes remains a major bottleneck. This review summarizes how AI is reshaping neoantigen discovery, from somatic variant calling, HLA typing, and peptide processing to peptide–MHC binding, presentation, and T cell recognition. We first outline the immunobiological foundations of antigen presentation, emphasizing class I and II peptide-binding grooves and their allele-specific motifs, then describe AI workflows that integrate somatic mutation calling, HLA typing, transcriptomics, and immunopeptidomics to nominate candidate neoepitopes. We highlight recent AI-driven tools for presentation and immunogenicity prediction, integrative pipelines that support personal and shared neoantigen targeting, and early clinical applications in vaccination and T cell therapies. AI-driven models trained on eluted ligand datasets substantially outperform affinity-only predictors for peptide presentation across diverse HLA alleles and populations. Consortium-scale benchmarking demonstrates that integrating features of antigen processing, presentation, and TCR recognition can eliminate the majority of non-immunogenic candidates while retaining clinically relevant neoepitopes. Immunopeptidomics provides essential ground truth, revealing that only a small fraction of genomically predicted candidates are naturally presented and uncovering noncanonical antigen sources, including splice variants, post-translational modifications, and noncoding regions. Integrative pipelines now support both personal (private) and shared (public) neoantigen prioritization, enabling translational applications such as personalized vaccines and TCR-based therapies. AI-guided neoantigen discovery is now clinically actionable, enabled by immunopeptidomics and deep learning models. Despite significant progress, key challenges remain, including limited class II prediction accuracy, incomplete coverage of rare HLA alleles, tumor heterogeneity, and the need for standardized benchmarking and validation. Anchoring computational predictions to mass spectrometry–derived ligands and incorporating tumor evolution and immune escape mechanisms will be critical for improving target selection. Continued integration of AI, proteogenomics, and clinical data is poised to accelerate the development of effective, precision neoantigen-based cancer immunotherapies.
T cells mediate anti-cancer immune responses through recognition of neoantigens - cancer-specific, mutation-derived peptides presented by MHC proteins. “Public” neoantigens are a subset of neoantigens derived from recurrently mutated driver genes and presented by common HLA alleles, making them ideal immunotherapy targets. NRAS is the second most frequently mutated RAS isoform, and its common hotspot mutations (Q61R, Q61K, and Q61L) give rise to a family of HLA-A*01:01 (A1)-restricted public neoantigens.
This study aims to elucidate how the NRAS Q61 neoantigens are structurally and biophysically distinct from their wild-type (WT) counterpart and to resolve the mechanisms that enable a panel of patient-derived TCRs to achieve neoantigen specificity.
Differential scanning fluorimetry shows that each neoantigen and the WT peptide bind A1 with comparable affinity. X-ray crystal structures of the neoantigen/A1 and WT/A1 complexes reveal that the p7Q side chain of the WT peptide is “tethered” to the α2 helix of A1 via a network of hydrogen bonds. This network is disrupted with all neoantigens, increasing the solvent accessibility of the mutated p7 side chains and facilitating potential TCR interactions. In surface plasmon resonance (SPR) binding experiments, one TCR (TCR11L) binds all three neoantigens (Q61R, Q61K, Q61L) and the WT peptide with high affinity. Crystal structures reveal that TCR11L primarily contacts the penultimate p9E of the peptides, bypassing the p7 mutation site. However, T cell-based functional assays show that TCR11L responds only to the Q61K and Q61L neoantigens. Intriguingly, SPR kinetic analyses reveal significantly slower dissociation rates for TCR11L complexed with Q61K and Q61L compared to Q61R and WT, suggesting that the functional specificity of TCR11L is kinetically driven.
Collectively, these biophysical, structural, and functional studies reveal how TCR promiscuity can be exploited to enhance scalability in neoantigen-targeting therapies.
NIH R01CA286507
Vaccines and Immunotherapy (VAC)
Gihan Perera, Iñaki Etxeberria, Christopher A. Klebanoff et al.· Journal of Immunology· 0 citations
The strongest current signal supports use in adjuvant, perioperative, and minimal residual disease settings, usually in combination with checkpoint blockade or other immune-modifying strategies, usually in combination with checkpoint blockade or other immune-modifying strategies.
Minglu Ge, Ning Wu· Cancer Treatment and Researc...· 0 citations
The current role of AI is summarized across the peptide cancer vaccine development pipeline, from neoantigen discovery and epitope prioritization to prediction of peptide–HLA binding, antigen presentation, and T-cell receptor recognition, and the application of modern computational frameworks.
P. Brlek, J. Kolić, L. Bulić et al.· Frontiers in Genetics· 0 citations
This review outlines the molecular mechanisms driving neoantigen generation in CRC, including frameshift mutations, single-nucleotide variants, alternative RNA splicing, and circular RNA-derived epitopes, and evaluates neoantigen-directed therapeutic platforms, encompassing personalized neoantigen vaccines and adoptive T-cell therapies that are engineered to recognize neoantigen-derived epitopes.
Na Wang, Yi-Meng Xia, Ping Wang et al.· Medical Oncology· 0 citations
ERVs are consistently expressed and immunogenic in GBM, representing a scalable, tumor-specific antigen source that may overcome limitations of low mutational burden and provide a proof-of-concept for personalized vaccines targeting ERV-derived neoantigens.
Kenan Zhang, Megan C. Benz, K. Hotchkiss et al.· Journal of Immunology· 0 citations
Over the past decade, advances in sequencing technologies and computational pipelines enabled the development of personalized cancer vaccines (PCVs). Current PCV strategies primarily target cancer neoantigens generated by non-synonymous DNA mutations, which can result in altered amino acid sequences capable of eliciting tumor-specific immune responses. More recently, a distinct class of tumor-specific antigens (TSA), termed noncanonical or cryptic antigens, has emerged as an additional source of immunogenic targets. Unlike canonical neoantigens, noncanonical antigens typically cannot be identified by tumor/normal whole-exome sequencing, as they do not arise from classical DNA mutations. Instead, they are often associated with less well recognized and/or aberrant processes in the pathways from DNA to human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-presented peptides. Examples include transposable elements, circular RNA, translation of alternative open reading frames and/or long non-coding RNA, among others. Emerging evidence suggests that noncanonical antigens represent a substantial portion of the tumor-specific immunopeptidome and, similar to canonical neoantigens, are absent during thymic selection and can evade central tolerance and elicit T cell responses. Technological advances have increasingly facilitated the identification of noncanonical antigens. Long-read RNA sequencing reveals noncanonical transcripts by improving transcriptome assembly, while ribosome profiling provides genome-wide maps of actively translated regions, facilitating the discovery of peptides from aberrant translation events. Specialized molecular approaches enable enrichment and sequencing of circular RNAs, and immunopeptidomics using mass spectrometry allows for direct characterization of HLA-presented peptides. Together, these technological advances have led to an increasing interest in prioritizing and targeting noncanonical antigens in the next generation of PCVs. This review provides an overview of the diverse origins of TSAs beyond classical neoantigens and discusses emerging approaches that may enable the integration of these antigens in future clinical trials.
Yilin Yang, Thomas Kane, Abdurrahman Abdelzaher et al.· Cancers· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.