Skip to content
Open access

Exploring the Potential of Parent Report for Autism/Developmental Screening at the 18-Month Visit.

Sep 2026 · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · 0 citations · 38 references
Medicine

TL;DR

The TADAS model shows promise as being the only screen for that age with the generally recommended performance of over .7 for both sensitivity and specificity for both autism and DD.

Abstract

Purpose

To develop optimal algorithms of parent-administered items to improve the detection of autism and other developmental disorders at the 18-month visit.

Methods

Parents of 11,878 children aged 16-20 months completed the M-CHAT-R/F™, Q-CHAT-10-O, and ASQ-3R at scheduled 18-month pediatric visits via an online system. Ninety-six children with positive screens and 314 matched controls completed additional items, including the POSI; items from the FYI and POEM data banks, and the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory (MCDI) with short-form vocabulary. Diagnostic testing was conducted using the ADOS-2 Toddler Module and the Mullen. We evaluated a set of machine learning (ML) models predicting autism and Developmental Delay (DD). Model training used tree-based modeling under the gradient boosting framework with feature selection via the Boruta method with Shapley values and Bayesian hyperparameter optimization and synthetic data based on ~50% of our authentic data (n = 201), resulting in a synthetic training dataset of 25,000 cases and a synthetic validation dataset of 12,500 cases, each with > 90% accuracy. We evaluated the performance of top autism/Delay models using the authentic holdback sample (n = 202).

Results

The resulting model includes expressive vocabulary and items representing joint attention.

Conclusions

The model appears to be approximately twice as sensitive to autism as the M-CHAT-R-F and twice as sensitive as the ASQ-3 for DD. The TADAS model shows promise as being the only screen for that age with the generally recommended performance of over .7 for both sensitivity and specificity for both autism and DD.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Aug 2026

Development of the Screening Tool for Autism in Two-Year-Olds—Brief Form: Accuracy in Detecting Autism in Toddlers

A shorter version of the Screening Tool for Autism in Two-Year-Olds (STAT) that takes 5 to 10 min that could help clinicians more efficiently identify autism among toddlers already referred for developmental evaluation, facilitating timely referral for formal diagnostic confirmation and subsequent access to interventio...

Yu-Ru Hung, Yuh-Ming Hou, Lai-Sang Iao et al. · 0 citations
Open access 2026

Machine Learning and Explainable AI for Q-CHAT-10–Based Autism Spectrum Disorder Screening Assistance in Toddlers: Comparative Evaluation and Web Deployment

Machine-learning methods applied to questionnaire data may support early developmental screening for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), provided that model outputs are interpreted as screening assistance rather than as evidence of clinical diagnosis. This study develops and evaluates a comparative machine-learning and art...

Raj Kumar Thakur, Sagar Sitaula, Gopal Prasad Sharma et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Validating the Screening Tool for Autism in Toddlers and Young Children (STAT) in children aged 24–36 months in a low- to middle-income setting

Preliminary evidence is provided supporting the existing STAT cut-off of ≥ 2 in similar high-risk clinical populations, while larger multicenter and community-based studies are needed to confirm the performance and generalizability of this cut-off.

Thi Ngoc Tien Nguyen, Hieu K. T. Ngo, G. Dinh et al. · 0 citations
Oct 2026

Battling the Bottleneck: Evaluating Autism Diagnostic Training in Primary Care.

Training PCPs to diagnose autism in young children with obvious signs, has the potential to reduce diagnostic delays and improve access to early intervention and was associated with meaningful improvements in provider confidence.

Norah L. Johnson, A. Van Hecke, J. Hine et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

From clinical and typical separation to autism spectrum disorder and global developmental delay differentiation: Interpretable eye-tracking-based machine learning.

It is suggested that eye-tracking-based ML models may provide a promising approach for early screening of developmental conditions and ASD-GDD differentiation and future studies should validate these findings in larger, multicenter, and more balanced samples with richer dynamic eye-tracking representations.

Gang Zhou, Xiao-Bin Zhang, Xingda Qu et al. · 1 citation

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.