Skip to content

zannunakiz/Q1_Research_DQN-autonomous-vehicles: Q1 DQN_AV V1.0.0

Oct 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Abstract

Safety-Aware DQN Variants for Lightweight Sensor-Based Collision Avoidance in Autonomous Vehicles This repository contains the official research software, experiment code, and datasets supporting the manuscript "Safety-Aware DQN Variants for Lightweight Sensor-Based Collision Avoidance in Autonomous Vehicles." Paper Information Paper Title: Safety-Aware DQN Variants for Lightweight Sensor-Based Collision Avoidance in Autonomous Vehicles Authors: Dhidik Prastiyanto, Richky Abednego, Muhamad Kurniawan Fauzi, Budi Sunarko, Khoirudin Fathoni, Anton Satrio Prabuwono, and Meida Andini Rahmawati Corresponding Author: Richky Abednego Contact: richky.abednego@gmail.com Overview This project systematically evaluates three value-based Deep Reinforcement Learning variants—DQN, Double DQN, and Dueling Double DQN—for autonomous vehicle collision avoidance in a structured three-lane environment. Designed for efficiency, the framework relies on a low-cost, camera-free sensor configuration consisting of just seven distance sensors and normalized vehicle speed. The codebase provides a complete pipeline for training, evaluation, and safety-aware obstacle avoidance. It features mastery-based curriculum learning, safety-oriented reward shaping, and rigorous robustness testing against unseen obstacle layouts, sensor noise, reduced obstacle gaps, and out-of-distribution speeds. This release is intended to support the reproducibility, citation, and archival of our research implementation. Main Features Value-Based DRL Framework: Implementation of standard DQN, Double DQN, and Dueling Double DQN architectures. Lightweight State Representation: Camera-free navigation using a compact 7-sensor array. Safety-First Design: Custom safety-aware reward shaping for collision avoidance. End-to-End Pipeline: Complete scripts for training, evaluation, ablation studies, and statistical analysis. Robustness Testing: Pre-configured simulation environments to test against varied speeds, sensor noise, and complex unseen layouts. Citation If you use this software or find our research helpful in your work, please cite the associated Zenodo DOI and the related research article: @article{prastiyanto2026safety, title={Safety-Aware DQN Variants for Lightweight Sensor-Based Collision Avoidance in Autonomous Vehicles}, author={Prastiyanto, Dhidik and Abednego, Richky and Fauzi, Muhamad Kurniawan and Sunarko, Budi and Fathoni, Khoirudin and Prabuwono, Anton Satrio and Rahmawati, Meida Andini}, journal={ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology}, year={2026}, note={Under Review} }

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 7, 2026

Discovering the value of humanistic inquiry

Students in MIT’s Concourse program delve deeply into the human condition, debate challenging questions, and learn to develop judgment about issues that can’t be quantified.

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 7, 2026

Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses

Training AI agents with reinforcement learning can be challenging because their tools, context, and decision-making are managed by complex frameworks. Agent Lightning connects existing agents to RL training, making it easier to improve them without rebuilding them. The post Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.