Skip to content
Open access

Single-cell and in vivo profiling reveal heterogeneous and organ-specific CRISPR-Cas9 off-target and translocation outcomes

Aug 2026 · Nature Communications · Vol 17 · 0 citations · 115 references
Medicine

TL;DR

It is shown that off-target editing and translocations vary widely between individual cells and organs, motivating the development of more sensitive and organ-specific safety assays for CRISPR therapies.

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas9 holds promise for treating genetic disease, but rare off-target mutations and structural variants remain as key safety concerns, especially at scales relevant to therapy. Here, we establish workflows to resolve Cas9 off-target activity in vitro at single-cell resolution and in vivo across different tissues. Using clonally expanded electroporated mouse embryos and embryonic stem cells, we reveal that individual cells exhibit unique off-target and translocation profiles, including events missed in bulk analyses. Integrating single-cell editing with chromatin accessibility, transcription, and DNA methylation measurements suggest that sequence-independent features modulate Cas9 access and cleavage, with preferential editing in regions characterized by open chromatin and lower methylation. In Cas9-inducible mouse models, editing analyses reveal organ-distinct off-target spectra, DNA repair pathway usage, indel patterns, and markedly varying translocation propensity between tissues. These findings demonstrate that off-target activity is heterogeneous across cells and context-dependent across organs, motivating sensitive single-cell analyses and organ-specific evaluation in preclinical development to more accurately assess risk and improve the safety of CRISPR-based genomic medicines. CRISPR can treat genetic disease, but unintended DNA changes remain a safety concern. Here, authors show that off-target editing and translocations vary widely between individual cells and organs, motivating the development of more sensitive and organ-specific safety assays for CRISPR therapies.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Ultra-sensitive profiling of CRISPR-Cas off-target effects with Tracking-seq2

Track-seq2 provides a robust platform for sensitive off-target detection in primary cells, with sensitivity comparable to or exceeding current state-of-the-art methods.

Tingting Cong, Runda Xu, Xuancheng Chen et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Analytical dissection of CRISPR-Cas9-mediated gene editing fidelity: integrating next-generation bioanalytical platforms for precision immunotherapeutics and rare disease correction

This review focuses on analytical and translational frameworks for CRISPR fidelity assessment, with emphasis on the strengths and limitations of current bioanalytical platforms.

Arpita Mukherjee · 1 citation
Mar 2025

Genome-Wide CRISPR Screening Identifies Cellular Factors Controlling Nonviral Genome Editing Efficiency

A novel genome-wide CRISPR screening strategy that will facilitate the systematic engineering of novel nonviral genome editing delivery methods, where the identified novel gene hits can be further used to increase editing efficiency for other therapeutically relevant cell types.

Shivani Saxena, Meha Kabra, Amr A. Abdeen et al. · 2 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Genome-wide CRISPR screening identifies cellular factors controlling nonviral genome editing efficiency

To systematically map cellular factors constraining nonviral genome editing, influencing uptake and intracellular trafficking, we develop a genome-wide CRISPR screening platform linking perturbation of 19,114 genes to editing outcomes in human cells. We identify six negative regulators of delivery whose depletion increases editing efficiency by up to six-fold across diverse payloads, loci, and cell types. We test the top two factors, GJB2 and BET1L, in two distinct human models: correction of a pathogenic adenine base mutation in KCNJ13 and introduction of a cytosine base mutation in the GABAA receptor gene. Depletion of either improves base-editing outcomes by 6-fold, potentially through effects on delivery. In a patient-derived model of retinal channelopathy, knockdown of either gene improves lipid nanoparticle base editing efficiency by over 3.5-fold. This enables functional restoration of Kir7.1 ion channels in a subset of edited cells, highlighting cellular barriers as actionable targets to enhance the potency of genetic therapies. Low editing efficiency of nonviral delivery in post mitotic tissues presents a challenge to the field of gene therapy. Here, authors dissect the genetic regulators of nonviral delivery in post mitotic retinal epithelial cells describe strategies for improved base editor delivery and editing.

Shivani Saxena, Meha Kabra, Amr A. Abdeen et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

BASELINE: a CRISPR base editing platform for mammalian-scale single-cell lineage tracing

BASELINE, which uses base editing to generate high-resolution lineage trees in conjunction with single-cell profiling, is introduced, which uses the Cas12a adenine base editor to irreversibly edit nucleotides across target arrays built from 50 synthetic target sites.

Evan Winter, F. Emiliani, Aidan M. Cook et al. · 1 citation
Review Open access Jul 2026

In vivo delivery strategies for therapeutic CRISPR genome editing

A comprehensive review of delivery modalities of CRISPR systems solely in vivo that underpin their therapeutic translation and outlines the remaining barriers to durable, tissue-selective, and broadly deployable CRISPR therapeutics is provided.

L. Martin, Jure Bohinc, Alessandra Recchia et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.