Skip to content
#diffusion models Open access

THE AI LITERACY DIVIDE: ACCESS, CAPABILITY, AND INEQUALITY IN THE AGE OF GENERATIVE AI

Oct 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI

Abstract

The rapid diffusion of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly generative AI (GenAI), has shifted the digital-inequality question from whether people can access digital technologies toward whether they can understand, evaluate, and use AI effectively. Yet these dimensions remain fragmented across datasets and measurement approaches. This study develops an integrated measurement framework for examining the emerging AI literacy divide across six conceptually related stages: digital access, AI access, AI literacy, demonstrated capability, effective use, and realised benefit. The framework is used as an analytical architecture rather than as an empirically demonstrated causal pathway. The empirical analysis combines secondary-data quantitative analysis with structured cross-dataset evidence synthesis. Individual-level analysis is conducted using 1,205 observations from the FITPED AI-literacy dataset, representing 1,146 unique participants, while Eurostat, ITU, World Bank, UNESCO, OECD PIAAC, IEA ICILS, Pew Research Center, Stanford AI Index, ILO, and selected scholarly studies provide independent contextual and population-level evidence. FITPED measures perceived or self-reported AI literacy rather than demonstrated GenAI capability. The five-item AI-literacy scale has a mean of 3.991 on a five-point scale, a standard deviation of 0.676, and Cronbach’s alpha of 0.688. Perceived AI literacy is positively associated with AI readiness (ρ = .580), relevance (ρ = .484), career motivation (ρ = .450), and behavioural intention (ρ = .407), and negatively associated with AI anxiety (ρ = −.165). Male participants and participants in IT programmes report higher AI-literacy scores than their respective comparison groups. The findings indicate that current evidence can illuminate distinct components of AI inequality but does not yet support a complete individual-level model linking access, capability, effective use, and realised benefit.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Open access Jun 2016

Software Development in Startup Companies: The Greenfield Startup Model

The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.

Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 178 citations · ⚡14
#computer vision Open access Oct 2016

Software Startups - A Research Agenda

Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.

M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al. · 157 citations · ⚡17
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#computer vision Review Open access May 2015

A survey study on major technical barriers affecting the decision to adopt cloud services

The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.

Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al. · 111 citations · ⚡8
#computer vision Open access Feb 2018

Lean Internal Startups for Software Product Innovation in Large Companies: Enablers and Inhibitors

This study investigates how Lean internal startup facilitates software product innovation in large companies and identifies its enablers and inhibitors, and shows the potential of the method-in-action framework to investigate the Lean startup approach in non-startup context.

Henry Edison, Nina M. Smørsgård, Xiaofeng Wang et al. · 78 citations · ⚡6
#computer vision Conference Sep 2010

Exploring the Sources of Waste in Kanban Software Development Projects

The application of agile software methods and more recently the integration of Lean practices contribute to the trend of continuous improvement in the software industry. One such area warranting proper empirical evidence is a project’s operational efficiency when using the Kanban method. This short paper takes a new an...

Marko Ikonen, Petri Kettunen, Nilay V. Oza et al. · 67 citations · ⚡9

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.