Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningRemote-Sensing Image Classification
Abstract
Foundation models have shown remarkable generalization ability for few-shot learning (FSL). However, their potential for remote sensing scene classification has not been fully explored. Existing methods mainly adapt a single vision–language model and seldom exploit the complementary strengths of different foundation models. Moreover, the inconsistency between visual and textual representations limits the effectiveness of cross-modal learning under limited supervision. To address these issues, we propose a framework for few-shot remote sensing scene classification leveraging collaboration of foundation models. Specifically, the proposed framework integrates a large language model, a text-to-image diffusion model, and a vision–language model to enrich class semantics, synthesize category-related training samples, and learn transferable visual-textual representations. Furthermore, a Deep Cross-modal Alignment (DCA) module is developed to improve feature consistency across modalities. The DCA module incorporates multi-scale visual features, lightweight adapters, and a contrastive learning objective to obtain more discriminative task-adaptive representations. Extensive experiments on 12 remote sensing scene classification datasets under various few-shot settings demonstrate that the proposed framework achieves competitive performance compared with existing prompt learning and efficient parameter tuning methods, with consistent improvements observed on average across the evaluated datasets. Recent multimodal large language models evaluated in the zero-shot setting are additionally reported as references, while the 2-shot results of our method illustrate the performance when limited labeled data are available. This comparison provides a broader view of the trade-offs between label availability, classification accuracy, and inference cost across the two paradigms.
The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.
Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· IEEE Transactions on Softwar...· 178 citations· ⚡14
Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.
M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· e-Informatica Software Engin...· 157 citations· ⚡17
This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.
Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 127 citations· ⚡15
The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.
Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 111 citations· ⚡8
This study investigates how Lean internal startup facilitates software product innovation in large companies and identifies its enablers and inhibitors, and shows the potential of the method-in-action framework to investigate the Lean startup approach in non-startup context.
Henry Edison, Nina M. Smørsgård, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 78 citations· ⚡6
The application of agile software methods and more recently the integration of Lean practices contribute to the trend of continuous improvement in the software industry. One such area warranting proper empirical evidence is a project’s operational efficiency when using the Kanban method. This short paper takes a new an...
Marko Ikonen, Petri Kettunen, Nilay V. Oza et al.· EUROMICRO Conference on Soft...· 67 citations· ⚡9