Skip to content
Open access

AI Competencies for Teaching: From Conceptual Frameworks to Enacted Practices

Aug 2026 · ETS Research Report Series · Vol 2026 · 0 citations

TL;DR

This paper argues that clarifying AI competencies for teaching requires more than listing skills: it requires a coherent account of what these competencies involve, how they are enacted in practice, and what evidence can support teacher learning and professional judgment over time.

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly embedded in educational systems, teachers face new expectations for engaging AI as part of their instructional work and professional responsibilities. This paper argues that clarifying AI competencies for teaching requires more than listing skills: it requires a coherent account of (1) what these competencies involve, (2) how they are enacted in practice, and (3) what evidence can support teacher learning and professional judgment over time. We conceptualize these integrated capacities as AI competencies for teaching and distinguish them from broader notions of AI literacy by emphasizing application, professional judgment, and context sensitivity. Drawing on trends in how AI is reshaping teaching, we introduce a framing of AI’s roles in education (as tool, content, and context) to specify the instructional demands to which our current understanding of teaching competencies must respond. We then summarize features of existing competency frameworks to surface shared foundations and key tensions related to ethics, technical depth, professional agency, and domain specificity. We describe six interrelated domains of AI competencies for teaching, spanning AI content knowledge, AI technologies, pedagogical integration, ethical awareness, professional judgment and agency, and openness to continuous learning. To illustrate what these competencies look like in use, we present a scenario that makes teachers’ instructional decision-making visible when AI is present. Finally, we discuss progress-oriented, evidence-centered approaches, including implications for assessment, that can support teachers’ development of these competencies. This work ultimately positions AI competencies for teaching as central to sustaining ethically grounded, responsible, and professionally empowering teaching in AI-mediated educational environments. Suggested citation: Ober, T. M., Tenison, C., Phelps, G., Renfrow-Symon, E., Mikeska, J., & Dean, V. J. (in press). AI competencies for teaching: From conceptual frameworks to enacted practices. ETS Research Report Series. https://doi.org/10.64634/z5j3ts49

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Jul 2026

From Competency to Agency: Teachers' Views of the Purposes of AI Education

This study presents an abductive analysis of interview data from 13 Finnish teachers involved in national AI education development projects and conceptualises a potential synergy between the domains where students' self‐determined, informed engagement with AI is placed at the centre of educational efforts in AI education.

Janne Fagerlund, Pekka Mertala, Jukka Lehtoranta et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Open access Oct 2026

Empirically Grounding and Refining a Model for Teachers’ AI-Related Competences: Insights from Expert Interviews

This study examines and refines an existing competence model by incorporating perspectives from diverse stakeholder groups and elaborated to provide an empirically grounded, didactically actionable framework for teacher education and future research.

Luca Mikula · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

AI Competence Frameworks for STEAM Educators: A Knowledge Codification Perspective

This paper examines how eight EU and international competence frameworks codify AI-related knowledge for STEAM educators, using a dual analytical lens comprising AI-TPACK and STEAMCompEdu and proposes three emerging theoretical extensions to AI-TPACK to address the identified lacunae.

Michalis Ioannou, N. Spyropoulou, A. Kameas · 0 citations
Open access 2026

Prompts to Practice: A Pedagogical Framework for Human-Centered AI Engagement

The Instructional Model for Human-Centered Generative AI Engagement is introduced, a pedagogical framework designed to help faculty guide students in engaging with generative AI as a thinking partner rather than a shortcut.

A. Miles, Paige Haber-Curran, Khalid H. Arar · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

RETHINKING LEARNING IN THE AI ERA: THE AIAS FRAMEWORK FOR REFLECTIVE HIGHER EDUCATION

The research outcomes demonstrate that AIAS functions effectively as a learning architecture, aligning academic integrity with instructional design, and offers a replicable model for fashion programs and other disciplines seeking responsible AI integration.

D. Shen · 0 citations
Aug 2026

From Practice to Classroom: AI in Public Procurement Education and Management

Governments are beginning to see artificial intelligence (AI) as a way to boost productivity and knowledge, including in procurement, a core function of public service delivery. Drawing on the experience of Murray City, Utah’s early adoption of generative AI in request for proposals (RFP) development, and insights from prior literature, we highlight lessons for students and practitioners. We provide a step-by-step instructional guide for educators to facilitate iterative prompting using AI tools within a human-in-the-loop governance framework, demonstrating real-world AI integration in public service delivery. In aligning these lessons with public procurement practices, we focus on AI’s ability to function as an improvisational thought partner that augments human intelligence when practitioners face extreme time constraints, critical staffing shortages, competing responsibilities within the task environment, and an unprecedented scope of demands. Implications for public values and pedagogy are discussed.

A. Dimand, Emily A. Boykin, Brooke Smith · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.