Oct 2026· Companion Proceedings of the 2026 ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Systems, Programming, Languages, and Applications: Software for Humanity· 0 citations· 6 references
TL;DR
A warning-guided, slice-based, LLM-assisted pipeline for inferring Java nullability annotations, which infers the annotations @Nullable and @Nonnull without touching program logic as a step toward a type-system-independent inference technique.
Abstract
Java nullness checkers such as NullAway catch potential null-pointer errors, but adopting them on legacy code is difficult. Most projects lack complete nullability annotations, and existing tools such as NullAwayAnnotator are checker- specific and can still leave warnings behind. We present a warning-guided, slice-based, LLM-assisted pipeline for inferring Java nullability annotations. It first runs NullAway to locate the warnings, then uses Specimin, a type-directed slicer that extracts the minimum compilable code needed to reproduce a warning, to build a small slice around each warning-relevant method or field. It augments the prompt with usage context. The model gets two complementary inputs, the compilable slice and this textual evidence, and infers the annotations @Nullable and @Nonnull without touching program logic. Annotations are merged back, re-checked, and a post-processing loop fixes whatever still triggers a warning. On EventBus, where NullAwayAnnotator leaves 11 warnings unresolved, our pipeline resolves all warnings. We see this checker-guided design as a step toward a type-system-independent inference technique.
Supporting data, adapters, predictions and code for the article *Low-Cost LoRA Fine-Tuning of Small Language Models for Multi-Step Arithmetic Reasoning* by Jake O'Grady, Asena Isik Gürhan, Chee Fong Ting and Effirul Ramlan (University of Galway). We generated 20,000 GSM8K-derived arithmetic problems with step-by-step s...
O'Grady, Jake, Gürhan, Asena Isik, Chee, Fong Ting et al.· Zenodo (CERN European Organi...· 465 citations
The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.
Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· IEEE Transactions on Softwar...· 178 citations· ⚡14
Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.
M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· e-Informatica Software Engin...· 157 citations· ⚡17
This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.
Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 127 citations· ⚡15
The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.
Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 111 citations· ⚡8
This study investigates how Lean internal startup facilitates software product innovation in large companies and identifies its enablers and inhibitors, and shows the potential of the method-in-action framework to investigate the Lean startup approach in non-startup context.
Henry Edison, Nina M. Smørsgård, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 78 citations· ⚡6