Oct 2026· Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences· 0 citations· 91 references
Protein Structure and Dynamics
Abstract
The study of macromolecular assembly formation is one of the most challenging tasks in computational modeling as it requires extensive exploration of conformational and configurational space, especially when driven by conformational transitions or folding instabilities, which are typically associated with high energy barriers. Although this type of study has traditionally been addressed
in silico
by using techniques that reduce the computational cost of simulations, such as coarse-grained models, artificial intelligence (AI) has recently entered the field at multiple levels, aiding in parameter optimization or trajectory analysis and even replacing potentials or force calculations. Recently developed algorithms such as AlphaFold (AF) and RoseTTAFold enable the direct prediction of final structures with high efficiency and confidence, an achievement that earned them the 2024 Nobel Prize in Chemistry. In this study, we review and analyze the different AI-based strategies used to model protein structure and dynamics and simulate macromolecular assemblies, comparing them with traditional methods, to highlight their respective advantages and limitations. By placing these approaches along an ideal continuum in which accuracy increases as interpretability decreases, we show that hybrid solutions and combinations of methods can be devised to maximize their strengths. Finally, we perspectively outline practical strategies for implementing such integrated approaches in a coherent manner, preserving accuracy and feasibility while maintaining insight into aggregation pathways, intermediate structures, and the molecular mechanisms underlying the phenomenon.
The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.
Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 111 citations· ⚡8
This study investigates how Lean internal startup facilitates software product innovation in large companies and identifies its enablers and inhibitors, and shows the potential of the method-in-action framework to investigate the Lean startup approach in non-startup context.
Henry Edison, Nina M. Smørsgård, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 78 citations· ⚡6
This paper highlights the challenges to conduct proper affect-related studies with psychology, provides a comprehensive literature review in affect theory, and proposes guidelines for conducting psychoempirical software engineering.
D. Graziotin, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson· SSE@SIGSOFT FSE· 56 citations· ⚡4
This study conducts a multiple case study on twenty European software startups and proposes a prototype-centric learning model in early stage software startups, and identifies factors that occur as barriers but also facilitators for prototyping in earlystage software startups.
Anh Nguyen-Duc, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson· International Conference on...· 44 citations· ⚡5
It is demonstrated that linker-free PROTACs can outperform traditional designs, marking a paradigm shift in PROTAC development for targeted protein degradation.
Pinal, a 16-billion-parameter foundation model that produces protein candidates from natural-language functional descriptions, supports natural language as a high-level interface for candidate generation in protein design, enabling programmable exploration with reduced reliance on manually specified structural or seque...
A new machine-learning framework aims to improve the success rate of computational protein design while moving away from results that reproduce sequences found in nature.