Skip to content

Do Your Own Research: Learning to Forecast by Learning to Search

Oct 2026 · 0 citations · 9 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

An agentic forecasting environment, dataset, and harness built from 2,100+ resolved Polymarket questions is introduced; the agent acquires its own context at rollout time (web search, page reading, and financial time series, all restricted by layered leak filtering to information published before each question's cutoff), and the trained policy finishes ahead of every frontier model tested at evidence-based forecasting.

Abstract

Outcome-based reinforcement learning can train language models to forecast real-world events, but prior forecasting work either freezes research context before training or deploys agentic research only at test time, so the skill of gathering evidence is never shaped by the reward. We introduce an agentic forecasting environment, dataset, and harness built from 2,100+ resolved Polymarket questions; the agent acquires its own context at rollout time (web search, page reading, and financial time series, all restricted by layered leak filtering to information published before each question's cutoff), and we train Qwen3.5-35B-A3B (3B active parameters) on it with single-epoch GRPO under a Brier-score reward. Training changes how the agent interacts with information: calibration improves 30-40%, and search attempts fall from 3.8 to 2.25 per rollout as evidence discipline is learned. Evaluated in an identical harness against four frontier models, the trained policy also finishes ahead of every frontier model tested at evidence-based forecasting, including Claude Opus 4.5 (soft-Brier 0.254 vs. 0.256, n=265), at about 5% of the inference cost, and its margin is widest on the hardest questions, the ones the crowd itself had not decided. We release the environment, dataset, and per-rollout records as a reusable harness for temporal forecasting agents.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

AlphaBet: Reinforcement Learning for LLM Event Forecasting Agents

Forecasting an unresolved event requires finding relevant evidence and deciding how strongly it supports each outcome. Yet outcome-based training of Large Language Model (LLM) forecasters often begins with preassembled evidence at a single prediction date, leaving evidence acquisition outside the learning loop. We intr...

Li-Qin Ye, Rong-Zhi Zhang, Xin Liu et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Can Jev be Your Q or Policy in Reinforcement Learning?

Foundation models supply reinforcement learning (RL) with priors that mitigate its longstanding weaknesses in sample efficiency and transfer, but their token-by-token generation makes queries sequential and costly. Jev, a recently released decision model, generates nothing and returns calibrated, typed answers in a sin...

Yi Ma, Tian-Pei Yang, Yao-Dong Yang et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

T1: Terminal Agent Reinforcement Learning for Long-Horizon Tasks

T1, a Mixture-of-Experts model of 122B total trained with reinforcement learning, operating a real shell in a cloud sandbox for up to 300+ tool-call turns per task, rewarded by executing each task's own verifier by executing each task's own verifier.

Jun-Yao Yang, Yu-Cheng Shi, Zhong-Zhi Li et al. · 9 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

Can Language Models Learn to Forecast Stock Prices

Results show that post-training can substantially improve financial forecasting performance, together with changes in how the model investigates the market, on this outcome-selected benchmark.

Jia-Cheng Guo, Suo-Zhi Huang, Shu-Zhen Li et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Oct 2026

ASCENT: Online Test-Time Training of Long-Horizon Agents via Self-Distillation of Verified Experience

A large language model (LLM) agent solves long-horizon tasks through many reasoning-action turns, with one verification signal at termination. Deployed agents face streams of related tasks, making their trajectories a natural resource for improvement. In-context adaptation agents store reflections, memories, or skills...

Hao-Dong Lu, Dong Gong · 1 citation
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Does Learning to Predict the World Help Agents Act? Auditing World-Model Post-Training

This work replaces true next-observation targets with in-distribution mismatched observations and introduces a setting that replaces prediction-based rewards with independent random signals, which expands task coverage even when the reward carries no environment information.

Xin-Yu Che, Hang Yan, Yan-Chen Liu et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 28, 2026

Making machines that can listen

Professor Paris Smaragdis develops computers with superhuman hearing for applications like speech recognition, music understanding, and environmental monitoring.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.