An agentic forecasting environment, dataset, and harness built from 2,100+ resolved Polymarket questions is introduced; the agent acquires its own context at rollout time (web search, page reading, and financial time series, all restricted by layered leak filtering to information published before each question's cutoff), and the trained policy finishes ahead of every frontier model tested at evidence-based forecasting.
Abstract
Outcome-based reinforcement learning can train language models to forecast real-world events, but prior forecasting work either freezes research context before training or deploys agentic research only at test time, so the skill of gathering evidence is never shaped by the reward. We introduce an agentic forecasting environment, dataset, and harness built from 2,100+ resolved Polymarket questions; the agent acquires its own context at rollout time (web search, page reading, and financial time series, all restricted by layered leak filtering to information published before each question's cutoff), and we train Qwen3.5-35B-A3B (3B active parameters) on it with single-epoch GRPO under a Brier-score reward. Training changes how the agent interacts with information: calibration improves 30-40%, and search attempts fall from 3.8 to 2.25 per rollout as evidence discipline is learned. Evaluated in an identical harness against four frontier models, the trained policy also finishes ahead of every frontier model tested at evidence-based forecasting, including Claude Opus 4.5 (soft-Brier 0.254 vs. 0.256, n=265), at about 5% of the inference cost, and its margin is widest on the hardest questions, the ones the crowd itself had not decided. We release the environment, dataset, and per-rollout records as a reusable harness for temporal forecasting agents.
Forecasting an unresolved event requires finding relevant evidence and deciding how strongly it supports each outcome. Yet outcome-based training of Large Language Model (LLM) forecasters often begins with preassembled evidence at a single prediction date, leaving evidence acquisition outside the learning loop. We intr...
Li-Qin Ye, Rong-Zhi Zhang, Xin Liu et al.· 0 citations
Foundation models supply reinforcement learning (RL) with priors that mitigate its longstanding weaknesses in sample efficiency and transfer, but their token-by-token generation makes queries sequential and costly. Jev, a recently released decision model, generates nothing and returns calibrated, typed answers in a sin...
Yi Ma, Tian-Pei Yang, Yao-Dong Yang et al.· 0 citations
T1, a Mixture-of-Experts model of 122B total trained with reinforcement learning, operating a real shell in a cloud sandbox for up to 300+ tool-call turns per task, rewarded by executing each task's own verifier by executing each task's own verifier.
Jun-Yao Yang, Yu-Cheng Shi, Zhong-Zhi Li et al.· 9 citations
Results show that post-training can substantially improve financial forecasting performance, together with changes in how the model investigates the market, on this outcome-selected benchmark.
Jia-Cheng Guo, Suo-Zhi Huang, Shu-Zhen Li et al.· 0 citations
A large language model (LLM) agent solves long-horizon tasks through many reasoning-action turns, with one verification signal at termination. Deployed agents face streams of related tasks, making their trajectories a natural resource for improvement. In-context adaptation agents store reflections, memories, or skills...
This work replaces true next-observation targets with in-distribution mismatched observations and introduces a setting that replaces prediction-based rewards with independent random signals, which expands task coverage even when the reward carries no environment information.
Xin-Yu Che, Hang Yan, Yan-Chen Liu et al.· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 28, 2026
Professor Paris Smaragdis develops computers with superhuman hearing for applications like speech recognition, music understanding, and environmental monitoring.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 27, 2026
Prabha Jha used her experience with MIT Open Learning’s program for senior executives to develop AI solutions for her employer, Verizon, and to write a book.
Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.