Skip to content
#protein folding Dataset Open access

Refined Coordinate Structures and Pocket Analyses for Diabetes and Metabolic Disease Targets

Sep 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 43 references

Abstract

Dataset Title: Refined Coordinate Structures and Pocket Analyses for Diabetes and Metabolic Disease Targets (v3.0) Overview: Fully quality-controlled 3D structural models, geometric pocket analyses, DiffDock docking enrichment, and NIH NCBI cross-validated target records for 11 therapeutic targets in this disease area: ADIPOQ, FGF21, GIPR, GLP1R, HNF1A, IGF1, INS, INSR, IRS1, LEP, LEPR. This dataset is designed for direct use in structure-based drug design campaigns by academic and industrial research groups. What's New in v3.0 (Quality Changelog): (1) 100% of structures now pass the strict steric-clash quality gate (zero non-bonded heavy-atom pairs < 1.10 Å, verified by independent reload with missing-atom completion); (2) 0 large/complex target(s) in this collection were repaired via convergent KD-tree localized clash-cluster repair and staged OpenMM minimization, and their pocket/docking analyses recomputed on the clean geometry; (3) an NCBI Entrez biological validation layer was added for every target; (4) a machine-readable manifest (CSV+JSON) with per-file MD5 checksums and per-target QC metrics was added; (5) standard file naming and engine-version provenance throughout. Included Targets: TargetNCBI Gene IDIndicationStructureClashes (<1.1 Å)Min dist (Å)Validated pocketsDocked compoundsTop reference compoundNCBI statusADIPOQ9370Obesity and insulin resistance (adiponectin)refined0>1.10 (no pairs)32CaffeinevalidatedFGF2126291Obesity and fatty liver diseaserefined0>1.10 (no pairs)12CaffeinevalidatedGIPR2696Type 2 diabetes (GIP receptor)refined0>1.10 (no pairs)12CaffeinevalidatedGLP1R2740Type 2 diabetes and obesity (GLP-1 receptor)refined0>1.10 (no pairs)32CaffeinevalidatedHNF1A6927MODY3 maturity-onset diabetesrefined0>1.10 (no pairs)42CaffeinevalidatedIGF13479Growth disorders and cancerrefined0>1.10 (no pairs)12CaffeinevalidatedINS3630Diabetes mellitus (insulin)refined0>1.10 (no pairs)02CaffeinevalidatedINSR3643Insulin resistance and type 2 diabetesrefined0>1.10 (no pairs)82CaffeinevalidatedIRS13667Insulin signaling and cancerrefined0>1.10 (no pairs)32CaffeinevalidatedLEP3952Obesity (leptin)refined0>1.10 (no pairs)12SucrosevalidatedLEPR3953Leptin-receptor deficiency obesityrefined0>1.10 (no pairs)52Caffeinevalidated Computational Methodology: (1) Structure prediction with the Boltz-2 deep-learning co-folding engine (NVIDIA NIM API); (2) physics refinement with OpenMM (Amber14-all force field, OBC2 implicit solvent, C-alpha harmonic guide restraints k_guide = 0.5, GPU/OpenCL); (3) for outlier targets: ultra-stable staged recovery (convergent KD-tree surgical pre-cleaning + cold→stabilizing→gold minimization) and localized Jacobi-style clash-cluster repair with rigid bonded-hydrogen movement, disulfide-aware (CYS→CYX) processing, and reload verification; (4) LIGSITE-style protein-solvent-protein pocket detection (0.9 Å grid, PSP ≥ 3) with geometric druggability gates (volume 120–2500 ų, ≥ 10 lining residues); (5) DiffDock (NVIDIA NIM API) docking enrichment with reference active compounds and decoy probes — higher (less negative) confidence scores indicate more reliable poses; (6) NCBI Entrez biological validation cross-referencing every target against curated NIH records. Quality Control: Clash gate definition: zero non-bonded heavy-atom pairs closer than 1.10 Å (bonded and sequence-adjacent residues excluded), measured after independent structure reload with missing-atom completion. All 11 targets in this collection pass. Aggregate: 30 validated pockets, 22 compound-target docking results, 11/11 targets with curated NCBI records. Data Contents: per target: refined coordinate structure (PDB with hydrogens), structure QC report, geometric pocket analysis (JSON), docking enrichment results (JSON), toxicology profile report (TPR, where available), consensus toxicology (JSON, where available), ClinVar variant-to-pocket map (JSON, where available), splice/chain provenance manifest (where applicable); dataset level: machine-readable MANIFEST (CSV+JSON, per-file MD5 + per-target QC), NCBI bio-validation layer (JSON), and README with methodology. Usage Notes: PDB files load directly into Schrödinger, MOE, Discovery Studio, PyMOL, ChimeraX and RDKit/OpenBabel pipelines (standard PDB format with hydrogens). Pocket residue lists in the JSON analyses use the structure's internal residue indexing (0-based); map to your numbering via the companion structure files. Docking confidence values are DiffDock confidence scores (higher is better). Important Caveat: All structures and analyses are computational predictions. They are suitable for hypothesis generation, lead discovery and campaign prioritization, and require experimental validation before clinical or therapeutic use. FAIR Compliance: F1–F4 (persistent DOI, rich machine-readable metadata, indexed in the nexus-resonance-codex community); A1–A2 (open access over HTTPS, metadata persistence via versioned records); I1–I3 (standard PDB/JSON/CSV formats, HGNC/NCBI vocabularies, qualified cross-references); R1–R1.3 (rich QC attributes, CC BY 4.0 commercial-use license, full provenance, domain standards). Integrity & Provenance: Every file in this dataset carries an MD5 checksum recorded in the machine-readable MANIFEST (CSV+JSON). Engine versions and generation dates are embedded in file names and companion QC reports. TTT-7 audit flags are organizational conventions only. License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) — open for academic and commercial therapeutic drug design. Principal Investigator: James Paul Trageser Affiliation: Nexus Resonance Codex ORCID: 0009-0006-6678-2908 X (Twitter): @jtrag Organization: https://github.com/Nexus-Resonance-Codex

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Open access May 2015

A survey study on major technical barriers affecting the decision to adopt cloud services

The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.

Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al. · 111 citations · ⚡8
#computer vision Open access Feb 2018

Lean Internal Startups for Software Product Innovation in Large Companies: Enablers and Inhibitors

This study investigates how Lean internal startup facilitates software product innovation in large companies and identifies its enablers and inhibitors, and shows the potential of the method-in-action framework to investigate the Lean startup approach in non-startup context.

Henry Edison, Nina M. Smørsgård, Xiaofeng Wang et al. · 78 citations · ⚡6
#computer vision Book Open access Jul 2015

Understanding the affect of developers: theoretical background and guidelines for psychoempirical software engineering

This paper highlights the challenges to conduct proper affect-related studies with psychology, provides a comprehensive literature review in affect theory, and proposes guidelines for conducting psychoempirical software engineering.

D. Graziotin, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 56 citations · ⚡4
#machine learning Open access May 2017

What Influences the Speed of Prototyping? An Empirical Investigation of Twenty Software Startups

This study conducts a multiple case study on twenty European software startups and proposes a prototype-centric learning model in early stage software startups, and identifies factors that occur as barriers but also facilitators for prototyping in earlystage software startups.

Anh Nguyen-Duc, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 44 citations · ⚡5
#protein folding Open access Sep 2026

Programmable design of functional proteins from natural language

Pinal, a 16-billion-parameter foundation model that produces protein candidates from natural-language functional descriptions, supports natural language as a high-level interface for candidate generation in protein design, enabling programmable exploration with reduced reliance on manually specified structural or seque...

Fengyuan Dai, Shiyang You, Yudian Zhu et al. · 31 citations · ⚡3

Related blog posts

Google DeepMind Blog Sep 30, 2026

Introducing SynthID Bio

Proof of concept for watermarking AI-generated proteins while preserving biological function.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Aug 27, 2026

Looking beyond natural sequences

A new machine-learning framework aims to improve the success rate of computational protein design while moving away from results that reproduce sequences found in nature.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.