Sep 2026· Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Abstract
Peer-to-peer language-model inference has so far been pursued by splitting the model: transformer layers or tensors are distributed across machines, and intermediate activations traverse the public internet on every generated token. This places the design squarely against a bandwidth gap of roughly five orders of magnitude and a latency gap of four to five, between datacenter interconnect and consumer last-mile links. This paper specifies Swarmbly, a protocol that distributes the problem instead. A client-side orchestrator, itself a small language model, decomposes a request into a directed acyclic graph of semantic micro-tasks; each micro-task is dispatched once, asynchronously, to a volunteer node running a complete small model (1–8B parameters); returned fragments — contigs, in the genome-assembly vocabulary the design borrows — are verified, selected and spliced locally. Network traversal occurs once per fragment per session rather than once per layer per token. Swarmbly AI A decentralized inference protocol that fragments the problem, not the model. Swarmbly dispatches semantic micro-tasks to volunteer nodes running complete small language models (SLMs, 1–8B), and reassembles the answers on the client with an orchestrator SLM — using genome shotgun assembly (reads, contigs, overlap, scaffolding, consensus) as its design vocabulary. Existing peer-to-peer inference systems split the model: layers or tensors live on different machines, and activations cross the public internet on every token. Swarmbly splits the problem: each fragment crosses the network once, and every worker runs a whole, small, independent model.
Supporting data, adapters, predictions and code for the article *Low-Cost LoRA Fine-Tuning of Small Language Models for Multi-Step Arithmetic Reasoning* by Jake O'Grady, Asena Isik Gürhan, Chee Fong Ting and Effirul Ramlan (University of Galway). We generated 20,000 GSM8K-derived arithmetic problems with step-by-step s...
O'Grady, Jake, Gürhan, Asena Isik, Chee, Fong Ting et al.· Zenodo (CERN European Organi...· 465 citations
The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.
Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· IEEE Transactions on Softwar...· 178 citations· ⚡14
Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.
M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· e-Informatica Software Engin...· 157 citations· ⚡17
This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.
Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 127 citations· ⚡15
The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.
Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 111 citations· ⚡8
This study investigates how Lean internal startup facilitates software product innovation in large companies and identifies its enablers and inhibitors, and shows the potential of the method-in-action framework to investigate the Lean startup approach in non-startup context.
Henry Edison, Nina M. Smørsgård, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 78 citations· ⚡6