Skip to content

Machine Learning in Personalized Drug-Dose Optimization: A Review

Sep 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism

Abstract

Dosing decisions for narrow-therapeutic-index and highly variable drugs have historically relied on population-based nomograms, therapeutic drug monitoring, and clinician heuristics, which frequently under- or over-dose individual patients. Machine learning (ML) offers a data-driven alternative capable of integrating genomic, physiological, and longitudinal clinical information to individualize dosing. This review synthesizes recent literature on ML-based precision dosing across five therapeutic domains—anticoagulation, antibiotics, immunosuppression, oncology, and diabetes—and examines the major methodological families in use: classical supervised learning, deep learning, neural ordinary differential equations, and reinforcement learning. Across domains, ML models consistently outperform linear pharmacogenetic and population pharmacokinetic algorithms in retrospective accuracy, and reinforcement learning shows promise for sequential, adaptive dosing in closed-loop systems such as the artificial pancreas. However, clinical translation remains limited by small and non-diverse training cohorts, weak external validation, limited interpretability of complex models, and an evolving regulatory landscape for adaptive software a s a medical device. Emerging approaches—hybrid mechanistic-ML models, neural ODEs, explainable AI, and patient-specific digital twins—are discussed as pathways toward safer, more transparent, and clinically actionable dose-individualization tools. The review concludes that realizing the potential of ML in precision dosing will require prospective validation, standardized reporting, and close integration with pharmacometric principles rather than treating ML as a replacement for mechanistic understanding.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 7, 2026

Discovering the value of humanistic inquiry

Students in MIT’s Concourse program delve deeply into the human condition, debate challenging questions, and learn to develop judgment about issues that can’t be quantified.

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 7, 2026

Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses

Training AI agents with reinforcement learning can be challenging because their tools, context, and decision-making are managed by complex frameworks. Agent Lightning connects existing agents to RL training, making it easier to improve them without rebuilding them. The post Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.