Aug 2026· Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Abstract
Deep generative models---neural networks that learn data's distribution and sample from it---matured from variational autoencoders' latent geometry to diffusion models' state-of-the-art images. This article presents a narrative review of that arc's canonical line: Kingma and Welling's 2013 auto-encoding variational Bayes, Goodfellow and colleagues' 2014 generative adversarial networks, Mirza and Osindero's 2014 conditional GANs, Rezende and Mohamed's 2015 normalizing flows, Sohl-Dickstein and colleagues' 2015 nonequilibrium thermodynamics, Arjovsky and colleagues' 2017 Wasserstein GANs, Karras and colleagues' 2019 style-based generator, Ho and colleagues' 2020 denoising diffusion, Ramesh and colleagues' 2021 text-to-image generation, Dhariwal and Nichol's 2021 diffusion-beats-GANs result, Nichol and Dhariwal's 2021 improved diffusion, and Rombach and colleagues' 2022 latent diffusion. The synthesis is organized around three themes: latent foundations, in which autoencoders and flows made sampling principled; adversarial training, in which games between generator and discriminator produced realism; and diffusion's rise, in which denoising trajectories conquered synthesis. It is concluded that generative modeling's decade ran from likelihood's compromise to sampling's triumph---and that latent diffusion is the field's new foundation.
The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.
Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· IEEE Transactions on Softwar...· 178 citations· ⚡14
Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.
M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· e-Informatica Software Engin...· 157 citations· ⚡17
This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.
Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 127 citations· ⚡15
The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.
Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 111 citations· ⚡8
This study investigates how Lean internal startup facilitates software product innovation in large companies and identifies its enablers and inhibitors, and shows the potential of the method-in-action framework to investigate the Lean startup approach in non-startup context.
Henry Edison, Nina M. Smørsgård, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 78 citations· ⚡6
The application of agile software methods and more recently the integration of Lean practices contribute to the trend of continuous improvement in the software industry. One such area warranting proper empirical evidence is a project’s operational efficiency when using the Kanban method. This short paper takes a new angle and explores waste in the Kanban-driven software development project context. A preliminary research model is presented for helping the consequent replication of the study. The results from the empirical analysis suggest Kanban can be an effective method in visualizing and organizing the current work, but does not prevent waste from creeping in, although the overall project outcome may be successful.
Marko Ikonen, Petri Kettunen, Nilay V. Oza et al.· EUROMICRO Conference on Soft...· 67 citations· ⚡9
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 14, 2026
The “HardFlow” algorithm could help generative AI models produce high-quality outputs that obey strict requirements when “pretty close” doesn’t cut it.
AI may appear weightless, but every model depends on physical infrastructure. To understand responsible AI, we need to look beyond algorithms and consider the entire lifecycle of the hardware behind them. The post Responsible AI Must Consider Its Afterlife appeared first on GPT-Lab.