Results show that accessible parameter information need not be expressed in forecasts when input changes miss the required hidden-state direction, and formalize these properties as Dynamical Parameters, including trend slope, oscillation frequency, and autoregressive dependence.
Abstract
This work studies a central gap in interpreting time-series foundation models (TSFMs): a dynamical property may be accessible in a hidden state even when the forecast fails to respond correctly as that property changes. We formalize these properties as Dynamical Parameters, including trend slope, oscillation frequency, and autoregressive dependence. We compare their representation accessibility, measured by recovery from hidden states, with their forecast response, measured by agreement with the expected forecast change. Across nine frozen TSFMs and thirteen laws, 42 of 63 model-parameter cells achieve accessibility above 0.95, whereas their median reference-aligned response relative to the conditional reference is only 0.46. To explain this gap, causal geometry compares the hidden-state change required to produce the reference response with the change induced by the parameter intervention. Directly modifying the hidden state recovers the reference response, but the parameter intervention often moves the state in a different direction. These results show that accessible parameter information need not be expressed in forecasts when input changes miss the required hidden-state direction.
Time series forecasting requires extrapolating the dynamics of an observed process beyond the last available measurement. Yet recurrent forecasting models typically treat observations as inputs that directly control their latent dynamics. It leads to a regime change when these observations become unavailable at predict...
Alexis-Raja Brachet, Guillaume Clavier-Frémond, Abdelhakim Ziani et al.· 0 citations
This study examines the role of causal smoothing in dynamical system-based financial forecasting by integrating an asymmetric backward Savitzky-Golay (SG) filter into the new Price Reversion Model (nPRM) and comparing it with conventional moving-average preprocessing on the S&P 500 index. Despite the theoretical advant...
Tsung-Jui-Chiang Lin, Yong-Shiuan Lee, T. Shieh· IEEE Conference on Computati...· 0 citations
What can and cannot be predicted by a model when only limited information is available? We answer this question by constructing a ladder of information limits that organizes prediction tasks according to their information requirements: from memoryless and memory-augmented trajectory forecasts to event prediction, stati...
Transitioning from bespoke time series models towards time series foundation models changes the relationship of model and application from one-to-one to one-to-many. This shift introduces concentration risk as many, potentially high-risk, forecasting applications are exposed to the same biases and failure modes of a si...
Mathis Jander, W. V. van Heeswijk, M. Mes· 1 citation
A time series world model (TSWM) predicts a controlled system's state from its observed history and planned actions and exogenous inputs. Current approaches build forecasters with actions as covariates, trained and evaluated on prediction error under the executed plan. Yet world models compare unexecuted plans, but the...
H. Zhang, Jia-Heng Guo, Zheng Xu et al.· 0 citations
Structural causal models for time series recover contemporaneous and lagged effects, but most methods require complete observation windows and become misspecified when samples are missing. We introduce ITSY, the first continuous-optimization method for causal discovery from irregular time series under a linear model. I...
Wen-Bo Xu, Yue He, Yun-Hai Wang et al.· 0 citations
Machine-learning networks can learn without detailed instructions from a designer. Those that do may offer insight into how the brain reorganizes itself during learning.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.