Skip to content

Jev earnings-call pre-registration

Sep 2026 · Open Science Framework

Abstract

Purpose Large language models are increasingly used to read corporate disclosures, and several studies report that an LLM's reading of earnings-call text predicts subsequent stock returns. Most of these studies date the text at the call itself, although transcripts become machine-readable only later, and they cannot rule out that a commercial model has seen the outcomes in its training data. This project asks a narrower, practical question: when an LLM reads the prepared remarks of a U.S. earnings call, is its reading associated with the next-session abnormal return that an investor could actually trade, given when the transcript becomes available? Design The reader is TypeSafe Jev (model pinned to jev-1.13.0). It returns a typed score of how favourable the news is relative to what the market already expected. The unit is the call, not the transcript version. Each call is dated by the creation time of its first transcript version, and entry is at the first market close that the transcript can reach. The outcome is the market-adjusted CRSP return on the next trading day. The signal is a point-in-time percentile of the score within size bucket. Controls are the day-0 return, momentum, and the IBES EPS and revenue surprises, with entry-date fixed effects and standard errors clustered by date and firm. The specification was frozen on a discovery sample of about 105,000 previously scored calls. It will be tested once on two samples no model had seen at registration: about 24,000 never-scored calls from 2011-2024 and about 8,600 calls from 2025. Pre-registered tests - H1 and H2: the association replicates on the never-scored and 2025 calls. - H3: net of half the quoted closing spread, the small-cap long-short spread is positive. - H4: a joint test of whether transcript latency limits implementability without selecting the effect. - H5: an open-weight reader with a documented training cutoff (Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct) predicts returns after that cutoff. - H6: a revenue-recall probe to date Jev's knowledge cutoff. - H7: the association is unchanged when firm and executive names, tickers and dates are removed from the text. Multiplicity is controlled by Holm's procedure over H1, H2, H3 and H5. Expected outcomes Calibration on the discovery sample gives about 15 bps per standard deviation of the score. The minimum detectable effect is about 8 bps for H1 and 12.5 bps for H2. On the discovery sample, the latency hypothesis H4 is not supported, and its failure is anticipated in the registration. Every test is reported whatever its outcome, using pass/fail wording written in advance, and any deviation is logged. Latency is measured for every scoring call and reported. Data The data are Capital IQ transcripts, CRSP and IBES. They are licensed and are not shared here; all frozen files are identified by their SHA-256 hashes in MANIFEST.sha256.

View source

Similar papers

#small language model Dataset Open access Oct 2026

Socratic guiding questions in synthetic arithmetic data: matched LoRA runs (revision v2)

Supporting data, adapters, predictions and code for the article *Low-Cost LoRA Fine-Tuning of Small Language Models for Multi-Step Arithmetic Reasoning* by Jake O'Grady, Asena Isik Gürhan, Chee Fong Ting and Effirul Ramlan (University of Galway). We generated 20,000 GSM8K-derived arithmetic problems with step-by-step s...

O'Grady, Jake, Gürhan, Asena Isik, Chee, Fong Ting et al. · 465 citations
#computer vision Open access Jun 2016

Software Development in Startup Companies: The Greenfield Startup Model

The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.

Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 178 citations · ⚡14
#computer vision Open access Oct 2016

Software Startups - A Research Agenda

Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.

M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al. · 157 citations · ⚡17
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#computer vision Review Open access May 2015

A survey study on major technical barriers affecting the decision to adopt cloud services

The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.

Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al. · 111 citations · ⚡8
#computer vision Conference Open access Dec 2013

Affordable and Energy-Efficient Cloud Computing Clusters: The Bolzano Raspberry Pi Cloud Cluster Experiment

The ongoing work building a Raspberry Pi cluster consisting of 300 nodes is presented, with potential use cases being an inexpensive and green test bed for cloud computing research and a robust and mobile data center for operating in adverse environments.

P. Abrahamsson, S. Helmer, Nattakarn Phaphoom et al. · 110 citations · ⚡7

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.