Aug 2026· Applied Business: Issues & Solutions· 0 citations
TL;DR
The study identifies a persistent fragmentation in existing research and proposes the Integrated Challenge Model for AI Curriculum Development (ICM-AI-CD), which conceptualizes AI integration as a dynamic socio-technical system comprising interdependent ethical-policy, pedagogical-design, and technical-institutional domains.
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly reshaping curriculum development in higher education as a
socio-technical, multidimensional phenomenon rather than a neutral technological tool. This study explores how AI
influences ethical governance, pedagogical design, institutional capacity, and contextual dynamics within curriculum
systems. Despite growing scholarly attention, existing literature remains fragmented, with ethical, pedagogical, and
institutional dimensions often examined in isolation, limiting a comprehensive understanding of their interdependencies.
Using a narrative integrative review design, this study synthesizes findings from 55 peer-reviewed studies
retrieved from major academic databases, including Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, IEEE Xplore, and ScienceDirect.
The analysis employed systematic coding and thematic synthesis across ethical-policy, pedagogical-design,
and technical-institutional domains. Findings reveal that AI introduces systemic ethical risks, including algorithmic
bias, transparency deficits, and data governance challenges, while simultaneously transforming pedagogical
practices through personalization and adaptive learning. However, these advances also raise concerns regarding
epistemic narrowing and the redistribution of human agency in teaching and learning processes. At the institutional
level, AI implementation is constrained by infrastructure limitations, governance misalignment, and dependence on
external platforms. Contextual factors further demonstrate that AI curriculum implementation is highly cultureand
institution-specific, challenging the feasibility of universal models of adoption. The study identifies a persistent
fragmentation in existing research and proposes the Integrated Challenge Model for AI Curriculum Development
(ICM-AI-CD), which conceptualizes AI integration as a dynamic socio-technical system comprising interdependent
ethical-policy, pedagogical-design, and technical-institutional domains. The study concludes that AI in curriculum
development represents a systemic transformation of higher education, requiring integrated frameworks that capture
its cascading and interdependent effects. This framework provides a foundation for future research, policy development,
and institutional planning in AI-enabled curriculum systems.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has brought about significant changes in the educational landscape, driven primarily by the advancement of generative models and the increasing availability of tools capable of supporting teaching and learning processes. This study aimed to analyze the main possibilities and challenges associated with AI in pedagogical practice through a structured narrative literature review. Searches were conducted in the Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, ERIC, SciELO, and Google Scholar, prioritizing publications from 2019 to 2026, while earlier foundational sources were retained when methodologically or conceptually relevant. The final interpretive corpus comprised 31 core sources, including peer-reviewed empirical studies, systematic and scoping reviews, meta-analyses, and institutional guidance. Evidence was synthesized into four themes: evolution and educational applications of AI, pedagogical potential, ethical and institutional challenges, and the changing role of teachers. The literature identifies opportunities for personalized learning, pedagogical planning, accessibility, formative assessment, and teaching-material development, but also recurring concerns involving information reliability, academic integrity, privacy, algorithmic bias, digital inequality, and teacher preparedness. Recent evidence indicates that positive outcomes are heterogeneous and depend on pedagogical scaffolding, human verification, institutional governance, and AI literacy. AI should therefore be understood as a supportive educational technology rather than a substitute for teacher mediation. Its integration requires critical, ethical, and pedagogically grounded use that preserves student autonomy, assessment validity, and educational equity.
A. F. da Silva, Rosimeire Rozendo, Cristiane Aparecida Simão Silverio· Brazilian Journal of Science· 0 citations
The review shows that AI offers substantial potential for personalised learning, scalable feedback, administrative automation and curriculum innovation, but that effective integration requires transparent governance, educator training, reliable evidence, accessibility and a commitment to ethical and human-centred use.
Pu Chen, Sherry Bawa, N. Islam et al.· Higher Education Studies· 1 citation
Artificial Intelligence should be positioned as a complementary educational resource rather than a replacement for human expertise to ensure inclusive and meaningful educational transformation.
Artificial Intelligence should be positioned as a complementary educational resource rather than a replacement for human expertise to ensure inclusive and meaningful educational transformation.
Therese Kabala - Mwagalwa· Journal of Literacy Educatio...· 0 citations
A systematic review of peer-reviewed studies published between 2015 and 2024 concludes that while tools such as generative artificial intelligence, intelligent tutoring systems, virtual and augmented reality, and predictive analytics are increasingly present, their adoption is concentrated in specific areas, particularly problem-solving, simulation, and assessment.
Firas Almasri· International journal of tec...· 0 citations
It is shown that successful GenAI integration requires a balanced approach combining technological capability, pedagogical redesign, and responsible governance, and that successful GenAI integration requires a balanced approach combining technological capability, pedagogical redesign, and responsible governance.
Syusinka Rahmatika, Martanto, Ryan Hamonangan· Immortalis Journal of Interd...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.