Skip to content
Preprint

From Plots to Words: Model-Aware Multimodal Explanations as a Foundation for Accessible, Non-Visual Interaction

Jul 2026 · 0 citations · 11 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

A context-aware, multi-agent framework that integrates textual queries, numerical data, visual representations, and model-derived signals for explainable time-series forecasting, which argues makes the approach a natural foundation for non-visual, accessible interaction of particular relevance to blind and visually impaired users.

Abstract

Multimodal large language models are increasingly used in interactive systems, yet ensuring consistent, trustworthy reasoning across heterogeneous modalities remains challenging. We present a context-aware, multi-agent framework that integrates textual queries, numerical data, visual representations, and model-derived signals for explainable time-series forecasting. A distinctive feature is that it turns predominantly visual forecasting outputs (e.g., trend plots) into structured, model-aware textual explanations. We argue that this makes the approach a natural foundation for non-visual, accessible interaction of particular relevance to blind and visually impaired users, for whom plot-centric interfaces are largely inaccessible. The framework supports three progressively richer pipelines (baseline, interpretable, explainable), enabling systematic comparison of unimodal, perception-driven, and model-aware responses. In an exploratory evaluation using an LLM-based judge as an early-stage proxy for human assessment, the explainable configuration improves overall explanation quality by up to 32% over a numerical baseline, with notable gains in trustworthiness and model awareness. We position user-centered validation with target users, including screen-reader and speech-interface users, as the essential next step rather than a claim established here.

View source

Similar papers

Jul 2026

See2Think: Do Multimodal Models Really Use Intermediate Visual States?

Evaluating representative proprietary and open-source multimodal models, it is found that visual reasoning is strongly model- and environment-dependent, with no single setting consistently dominating across tasks.

Siyu Yan, Zhuoran Yan, Haiying Xu et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Model Guides You How to Draw: Adaptive Visual Gating for Unified Multimodal Reasoning

It is observed that the model's internal signals can indicate whether a visual step will benefit reasoning before the entire visual generation is completed, and AdaViG, a training-free adaptive visual gating method for unified multimodal reasoning, is proposed.

Wen Gao, Guanxi Lu, Di-Di Zhu et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Think with Structured Grounding: Perceptual Reinforcement Learning for Chart and Visual-Tabular Understanding

Think with Structured Grounding (TwSG), a novel fine-grained image perception framework designed to internalize complex images's tool-use capabilities within the model, is proposed, endowing models with native fine-grained region description and flexible reasoning capabilities.

Chang-Jiang Jiang, Qiannian Zhao, Lei Xin et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Show, Don't Tell: Evaluating Spatial Cognition in Generative Pixels Rather Than LLM Text

ProVisE (Protocolized Visual Evaluation), a benchmark-agnostic framework that elicits protocol-constrained visual answers from image-generation models and parses them into structured predictions compatible with original metrics, is proposed and revealed, revealing complementary strengths of pixel-space expression and text-based reasoning.

Xu Wang, Kaixiang Yao, Miao Pan et al. · 1 citation
#computer vision Preprint Sep 2026

InSight: A Benchmark for Agentic Claim Verification in Interactive Visualizations

Vision Language Models have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in interpreting static visual artifacts, but modern data analysis is inherently dynamic, requiring the active interrogation of interactive environments. Existing benchmarks are predominantly constrained to static imagery and one-shot question answering and fail to capture the epistemic demands of this domain, where evidence is frequently occluded, distributed across linked views, or conditionally revealed through user agency. In this paper, we introduce InSight, a benchmark for agentic claim verification over interactive visualizations. The dataset consists of 21,349 claims derived from human-authored analytical narratives and grounded in fully interactive web-based environments. Agents must navigate these environments to determine whether a natural language claim is supported, refuted or not verifiable given the available evidence. Unlike traditional evaluations, InSight treats interaction traces as intrinsic proxies for reasoning, enabling a rigorous audit of how models seek and synthesize visual evidence. We evaluate state-of-the-art models, revealing that interactive verification remains a non-trivial challenge. We release InSight at https://github.com/maevehutch/insight.

Maeve Hutchinson, Syed Mahbubul Huq, Mohammad Albinhassan et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Mixture-of-Thought-Tokens: Unifying Perception and Reasoning for Free-form Multimodal Grounding

This work introduces Spatially-Grounded Thought Tokenization to explicitly align special tokens with spatial locations for clear spatial correspondence and visual interpretability, and proposes Mixture-of-Thought-Tokens, a new free-form multimodal grounding method that bridges the perception-reasoning gap.

Tianyi Gao, Han Fang, Tianyi Ding et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.