Skip to content
Preprint

Think with Structured Grounding: Perceptual Reinforcement Learning for Chart and Visual-Tabular Understanding

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 59 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Think with Structured Grounding (TwSG), a novel fine-grained image perception framework designed to internalize complex images's tool-use capabilities within the model, is proposed, endowing models with native fine-grained region description and flexible reasoning capabilities.

Abstract

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) capable of thinking with images often rely on external tools for fine-grained perception. However, this reliance introduces significant inference latency and fails to effectively resolve the spatial-structural gap-a fundamental challenge in text-dense and structurally relational visuals (e.g., charts and visual tables) where strict relative spatial arrangements bind textual elements. Without external tools, standard MLLMs struggle with such fine-grained visual reasoning tasks. To address these issues, we propose Think with Structured Grounding (TwSG), a novel fine-grained image perception framework designed to internalize complex images's tool-use capabilities within the model. TwSG distills the benefits of multi-step reasoning and micro-cropping into a single efficient forward pass during inference. Specifically, we use an MLLM to identify key regions guided by ground-truth answers, and then prompt a teacher model to generate high-quality visual question-answering (VQA) data. These fine-grained, region-based supervisory signals are subsequently distilled back into the full-image representation. Our training pipeline consists of two stages: (1) a cold-start supervised fine-tuning (SFT) phase using multi-turn data with focused area descriptions to foster complex reasoning and error recovery; and (2) a reinforcement fine-tuning (RFT) phase driven by a novel process reward mechanism, TL-GRPO, which encourages strategic reasoning. Extensive experiments across various MLLM architectures demonstrate that TwSG reduces inference latency while substantially improving accuracy and robustness, endowing models with native fine-grained region description and flexible reasoning capabilities.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Preprint Aug 2026

ReVA: A Region-Aware Visual Assistant for Visually Grounded Question Answering

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in Visual Question Answering (VQA), yet they continue to struggle with questions requiring precise spatial reasoning and fine-grained visual understanding. These limitations often manifest as object, attribute, and spatial hallucinations, where models generate confident but visually unsupported responses due to insufficient region-level and fine-grained visual grounding. To address this challenge, we propose ReVA, a region-aware VQA model that employs a frozen CLIP ViT-L/14 Vision Transformer (ViT) and a Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct large language model (LLM) connected through a dual bridge that aligns both whole-image and region-level representations with the LLM's embedding space. The image bridge maps final transformer block features into image tokens. The region bridge maps cropped features from enriched intermediate features across ViT blocks so early texture and later object cues are more evident, into K region tokens for every bounding box. ReVA uses a detector stack that supplies automatic zero-shot bounding boxes that are both question-agnostic and question-dependent, using RAM++ (Recognize Anything Model), spaCy, and Grounding DINO. The image tokens and region tokens are concatenated as an LLM prompt prefix to jointly encode scene-level context and fine-grained regional evidence when answering questions. Evaluated on VQAv2, MMBench, POPE, and SEED-Bench, ReVA achieves 82.85% mean F1 on POPE, compared with 81.14% for an image-token baseline without region tokens. These results demonstrate that explicit region-aware visual representations reduce object hallucination and improve the factual grounding of MLLMs.

A. Senthil · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

GLaQ: Grounding Latent Queries in Visual Evidence for Multimodal Reasoning

GLaQ, a grounded latent-query framework that replaces sequential latent rollout with a fixed set of context-conditioned queries grounded in the original visual tokens, is introduced, suggesting that direct query-to-image grounding can recover localized evidence from the full image without external visual operations or autoregressive latent rollouts.

Zesheng Yang, Lingling Zhang, Xinyu Zhang et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Mixture-of-Thought-Tokens: Unifying Perception and Reasoning for Free-form Multimodal Grounding

This work introduces Spatially-Grounded Thought Tokenization to explicitly align special tokens with spatial locations for clear spatial correspondence and visual interpretability, and proposes Mixture-of-Thought-Tokens, a new free-form multimodal grounding method that bridges the perception-reasoning gap.

Tianyi Gao, Han Fang, Tianyi Ding et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Seeing or Knowing? Visual Context Sensitivity in Multimodal Large Language Models

For the coarse attributes the authors study, MLLMs encode the visual evidence but cannot reliably control their reliance on it, indicating that for the coarse attributes they study, MLLMs cannot reliably control their reliance on it.

Jiaang Li, Chengzu Li, Zhaochong An et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Show, Don't Tell: Evaluating Spatial Cognition in Generative Pixels Rather Than LLM Text

ProVisE (Protocolized Visual Evaluation), a benchmark-agnostic framework that elicits protocol-constrained visual answers from image-generation models and parses them into structured predictions compatible with original metrics, is proposed and revealed, revealing complementary strengths of pixel-space expression and text-based reasoning.

Xu Wang, Kaixiang Yao, Miao Pan et al. · 1 citation
Jul 2026

See2Think: Do Multimodal Models Really Use Intermediate Visual States?

Evaluating representative proprietary and open-source multimodal models, it is found that visual reasoning is strongly model- and environment-dependent, with no single setting consistently dominating across tasks.

Siyu Yan, Zhuoran Yan, Haiying Xu et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.