It is observed that the model's internal signals can indicate whether a visual step will benefit reasoning before the entire visual generation is completed, and AdaViG, a training-free adaptive visual gating method for unified multimodal reasoning, is proposed.
Abstract
Unified multimodal models (UMMs) with interleaved reasoning, which generate both textual and visual steps as part of intermediate reasoning traces, have demonstrated great potential for visual mathematical reasoning tasks. However, we identify a key insight in this paradigm: generating intermediate visual reasoning steps is not always beneficial and can even be harmful, as self-generated visual steps may introduce erroneous visual evidence that misleads subsequent reasoning. Moreover, frequently triggering visual steps during reasoning incurs substantial computational and memory overhead, degrading inference efficiency. To address these accuracy and efficiency challenges, we observe that the model's internal signals can indicate whether a visual step will benefit reasoning before the entire visual generation is completed. Specifically, this work identifies two internal signals: 1) Generation Intent, which reflects whether the model has a concrete textual plan for what to draw, and 2) Visual Fidelity, which measures whether the visual generation remains grounded in the original input image. Leveraging these internal signals, we propose AdaViG, a training-free adaptive visual gating method for unified multimodal reasoning. AdaViG dynamically evaluates each triggered visual step at an early visual generation stage and aborts it when both signals are weak, thereby preventing misleading visual evidence from entering the reasoning trace while avoiding unnecessary computation. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that AdaViG improves accuracy by up to 5.7% while reducing visual generation FLOPs by 25.0%-91.0% and wall-clock latency by 15.4%-45.6%.
VGAU-Diag is introduced, a fine-grained evaluation framework for vision generation-assisted understanding that stratifies samples by difficulty, enables unified evaluation of multiple reasoning paradigms, and uses Oracle-Ass Reference Protocols.
Yubo Zhu, Zhehan Kan, Jing-Yi Yang et al.· 1 citation
Evaluating representative proprietary and open-source multimodal models, it is found that visual reasoning is strongly model- and environment-dependent, with no single setting consistently dominating across tasks.
DeltaV is proposed, a ULMM that replaces full-image generation with visual updates and introduces a temporal similarity (TSIM) Router, which stops allocating tokens once the marginal reconstruction gain falls below a threshold.
Pengjie Wang, Linger Deng, Zujian Zhang et al.· 1 citation
Multimodal large language models increasingly use visual chain-of-thought (Visual CoT) to reason about spatial, temporal, and embodied environments. By generating intermediate reasoning images, Visual CoT provides an intuitive mechanism for visual foresight but introduces substantial inference overhead, which is particularly problematic for proactive video reasoning. We ask whether models can learn to think visually during training while reasoning directly at inference. We introduce Internalized Visual Thinking (IVT), a post-training framework that jointly optimizes textual prediction and next-embedding prediction over unlabeled videos. Given a partially observed video, IVT predicts latent representations of future frames together with the target textual answer, encouraging the model to capture motion, object transitions, interactions, and latent intent. At inference, IVT generates the answer directly without synthesizing or re-encoding future frames. We conduct controlled studies across target representations, decoder designs, prediction horizons, data mixtures, training curricula, and predictive objectives. IVT improves over direct-answer fine-tuning on all six evaluation settings while retaining the same inference pathway. Compared with explicit Visual CoT, IVT achieves comparable or better performance and reduces average end-to-end latency by more than 5x. Together, our findings suggest that explicit pixel-space generation at inference time, as used in visual chain-of-thought, may not be necessary for effective proactive video reasoning. Predictive world modeling can be internalized during training to produce multimodal reasoners that are both more accurate and substantially more efficient.
Xiaoyu Zhu, Xinke Deng, Suresh Taddewadikar et al.· 0 citations
TRAM (TRajectory-derived Auxiliary Memory), a training-free method that augments standard decoding with an auxiliary memory pathway derived from the model's own reasoning trajectory, shows that TRAM improves performance over vanilla decoding on mathematical, scientific, and general visual reasoning tasks without additional training.
Kang Liu, Zijing Wang, Yongkang Liu et al.· 0 citations
Vision-language models (VLMs) have advanced rapidly in multimodal reasoning, yet recent work shows that their failures often reflect an interaction between visual grounding and downstream reasoning. What remains less clear is how the visual presentation of a task shapes model performance and failure modes when the underlying reasoning problem is unchanged. We study this question in SPaRC, a benchmark for grid-based visual spatial planning, by introducing lightweight input-side scaffolds that preserve the visual modality while making spatial structure more accessible. Across multiple VLMs, these scaffolds improve task accuracy over the original visual setting by up to 34.0 percentage points and further complement GRPO-based training, yielding up to 4.6 additional accuracy points compared with near-zero gains on the original visual input. Analyses on both end-to-end task solving and object detection show that these gains are closely tied to reductions in grounding-related errors, while rule reasoning remains comparatively challenging. We find that visual presentation is a central factor that determines whether VLM benchmarks measure grounded perception, downstream reasoning, or a mixture of both.
Lars Benedikt Kaesberg, Tianyu Yang, F. Wunderlich et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
