Skip to content

How Europe Is Counted in AI: Money, Compute, Models, Price

Sep 2026 · arXiv (Cornell University)
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Abstract

This part sets out how each of the four scoreboards of Europe's AI position is built: venture capital, GPU-cluster compute, model output and inference prices. On money and compute Europe's shares are 6.1 percent of 2025 global AI venture capital as the EU27, about 12 percent once the UK, Switzerland and Norway are counted, and 5 to 6 percent of global GPU-cluster compute. On the record of what gets built, the widely quoted collapse in European model releases is in large part a property of the database it was read from, so the count was rebuilt from lab announcements under one rule applied to all three blocs: 1,290 full language models shipped in the United States, China and Europe between January 2023 and August 2026, of which Europe built 210 and Europe's commercial labs built 89. The rebuilt record still shows a fall, but confined to one half of Europe: those labs' share of the three blocs' commercial output fell from 22.0 percent in 2023 to 20.5, then 10.1, then 4.1 percent in the first eight months of 2026, while the rest of Europe's output, led by universities and national programmes, shipped within 5 percent of their best year. On price, Europe's best model is listed inside the band of China's two leading models while scoring far below both of them on the Artificial Analysis index. The same audit is applied to the money, where China's venture row omits the state and corporate totals whose AI share nobody publishes, and the US hyperscaler headline is total capital spending rather than AI spending. Five measurements do not exist as published figures. This part measures Europe's position without explaining it.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#computer vision Open access Jun 2016

Software Development in Startup Companies: The Greenfield Startup Model

The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.

Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 178 citations · ⚡14
#computer vision Open access Oct 2016

Software Startups - A Research Agenda

Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.

M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al. · 157 citations · ⚡17
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#computer vision Review Open access May 2015

A survey study on major technical barriers affecting the decision to adopt cloud services

The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.

Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al. · 111 citations · ⚡8
#computer vision Conference Open access Dec 2013

Affordable and Energy-Efficient Cloud Computing Clusters: The Bolzano Raspberry Pi Cloud Cluster Experiment

The ongoing work building a Raspberry Pi cluster consisting of 300 nodes is presented, with potential use cases being an inexpensive and green test bed for cloud computing research and a robust and mobile data center for operating in adverse environments.

P. Abrahamsson, S. Helmer, Nattakarn Phaphoom et al. · 110 citations · ⚡7
#computer vision Book Open access Mar 2017

On the Unhappiness of Software Developers

The results indicate that software developers are a slightly happy population, but the need for limiting the unhappiness of developers remains, and 219 factors representing causes of unhappiness while developing software are identified.

D. Graziotin, Fabian Fagerholm, Xiaofeng Wang et al. · 84 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 30, 2026

This game-playing AI is the new champ at Stratego

Able to defeat top-ranked human players and more efficient than other models, the new system could help decision-makers in military maneuvers or business negotiations.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.