Dec 2026· International Journal of Educational Research Open· Vol 11, pp. 100588· 0 citations· 45 references
Abstract
The educational use of artificial intelligence (AI) has expanded rapidly in recent years, offering new possibilities for individualized instruction and learner support. Despite its growing relevance, AI’s effectiveness in the development of reading comprehension among K-12 students remains limited. This systematic review synthesizes findings from 19 empirical studies that implemented AI-based interventions to enhance students’ reading comprehension. Following PRISMA guidelines, five major databases were searched for English-language peer-reviewed empirical studies published between 2015 and 2025 that examined AI-supported reading comprehension interventions in K–12 education. Nineteen studies met the predefined inclusion criteria and were synthesized across five analytical dimensions: the type of AI employed, the form of personalization included, the inclusion of SEN students, the presence of explicit comprehension strategy instruction, and reported affective and motivational outcomes. The findings reveal three overarching trends. First, AI-supported interventions consistently improved reading comprehension across diverse educational contexts. Second, personalization features, particularly adaptive feedback, individualized scaffolding, and dynamic text difficulty, emerged as instructional mechanisms most consistently associated with positive reading outcomes, regardless of the specific AI technology employed. Third, while recent studies increasingly incorporated large language models and AI-driven reading platforms, evidence regarding learners with special educational needs remained limited, restricting the generalizability of current findings. This review contributes to the literature by identifying personalization as the key instructional mechanism underlying successful AI-supported reading interventions and by highlighting important research gaps related to SEN learners, long-term effectiveness, and the transparent reporting of AI systems. These findings also provide practical guidance for educators seeking to implement AI-supported reading instruction in K–12 classrooms.
GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations...
Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al.· arXiv.org· 216 citations· ⚡17
This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.
The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.
Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· IEEE Transactions on Softwar...· 178 citations· ⚡14
Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.
M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· e-Informatica Software Engin...· 157 citations· ⚡17
This work investigates the possibilities of using LLMs in a resume screening setting via a document retrieval framework that simulates job candidate selection and finds that the MTEs are biased, significantly favoring White-associated names in 85% of cases and female-associated names in only 11.1% of cases.
This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.
Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 127 citations· ⚡15