The framework, Common Logic Grammar Construction (CLGC), is open-source, as the first Python library for automatically generating syllogisms in KR notations and defining their SEF categories, and proposes a syllogistic categorization method (SEF) that is used to enrich ZS prompts with logical definitions, which boost reasoning in small models.
Abstract
Language models (LMs) struggle with logical tasks like reasoning on syllogisms. It has been shown that Knowledge Representation (KR) plays a crucial role in expressing input information to help models solve tasks. This observation motivates our study of the impact of different formal KR notations on syllogistic reasoning by extending the FOLIO and P-FOLIO datasets. Our experiments on Small Language Models (SLMs) in Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Zero-Shot (ZS) settings show that the choice of input notation can yield performances competitive with natural language while enabling faster inference. We also propose a syllogistic categorization method (SEF) and use it to enrich ZS prompts with logical definitions, which boost reasoning in small models. We open-source our framework, Common Logic Grammar Construction (CLGC), as the first Python library for automatically generating syllogisms in KR notations and defining their SEF categories.
This paper compares four representational conditions for syllogistic reasoning: natural language, logical notation, linear diagrams, and Euler diagrams, and suggests that the tested models gain limited benefit from diagrams in logical reasoning tasks.
Risako Ando, Koji Mineshima· Diagrams· 0 citations
It is shown that logical incoherencies follow from an LLM’s computation of its internal representations, in particular from an LLM’s failure to take account of the different roles that different expressions may play in determining content.
Nicholas Asher, Swarnadeep Bhar· Topoi· 0 citations
This work delineates LLM reasoning boundaries and presents a new paradigm for fine-grained capability assessment, which suggests that genuine reasoning is demonstrated only when a model follows logical rules despite conflicting prior knowledge.
Fangfei Yan, Jianbo Yao, Michael K. Chen et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 1 citation
This paper adapts VANESSA, a neuro-symbolic method for chain-of-thought verification, to reasoning-based question answering, and develops a transparent, logic-based approach to answer natural language questions even with phrase variations.
Zacchary Sadeddine, Fabian M. Suchanek· Proceedings of the Thirty-Fi...· 0 citations
Reasoning Language Models (RLMs) achieve their strongest performance when they reason in English, the language for which reasoning-oriented training data is most abundant. However, reasoning trace is a clue for model interpretability and safety, and useful in practice for both the model users and for model developers....
A novel fragment-based reasoning framework is introduced in which the model first extracts parallel source-target fragments from retrieved similar exemplars, and uses these fragments as intermediate reasoning traces to produce the final translation.
Maxime Bouthors, J. Crego, François Yvon· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.