Skip to content
Preprint

Are you Talking Logic to Me? Assessing Language Models Syllogistic Reasoning Capabilities

Jul 2026 · 0 citations · 38 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

The framework, Common Logic Grammar Construction (CLGC), is open-source, as the first Python library for automatically generating syllogisms in KR notations and defining their SEF categories, and proposes a syllogistic categorization method (SEF) that is used to enrich ZS prompts with logical definitions, which boost reasoning in small models.

Abstract

Language models (LMs) struggle with logical tasks like reasoning on syllogisms. It has been shown that Knowledge Representation (KR) plays a crucial role in expressing input information to help models solve tasks. This observation motivates our study of the impact of different formal KR notations on syllogistic reasoning by extending the FOLIO and P-FOLIO datasets. Our experiments on Small Language Models (SLMs) in Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Zero-Shot (ZS) settings show that the choice of input notation can yield performances competitive with natural language while enabling faster inference. We also propose a syllogistic categorization method (SEF) and use it to enrich ZS prompts with logical definitions, which boost reasoning in small models. We open-source our framework, Common Logic Grammar Construction (CLGC), as the first Python library for automatically generating syllogisms in KR notations and defining their SEF categories.

View source

Similar papers

Jul 2026

Do Diagrams Help Large Language Models Reason? Evidence from Syllogistic Reasoning

This paper compares four representational conditions for syllogistic reasoning: natural language, logical notation, linear diagrams, and Euler diagrams, and suggests that the tested models gain limited benefit from diagrams in logical reasoning tasks.

Risako Ando, Koji Mineshima · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Logical Misconceptions, Pragmatic Insufficiencies in LLMs and How to Fix Them

It is shown that logical incoherencies follow from an LLM’s computation of its internal representations, in particular from an LLM’s failure to take account of the different roles that different expressions may play in determining content.

Nicholas Asher, Swarnadeep Bhar · 0 citations
Book Open access Aug 2026

Investigating Reasoning in Large Language Models with Counterfactual Knowledge Graphs

This work delineates LLM reasoning boundaries and presents a new paradigm for fine-grained capability assessment, which suggests that genuine reasoning is demonstrated only when a model follows logical rules despite conflicting prior knowledge.

Fangfei Yan, Jianbo Yao, Michael K. Chen et al. · 1 citation
Conference Open access Sep 2026

Neuro-Symbolic Logical Reasoning with Textual Entailment

This paper adapts VANESSA, a neuro-symbolic method for chain-of-thought verification, to reasoning-based question answering, and develops a transparent, logic-based approach to answer natural language questions even with phrase variations.

Zacchary Sadeddine, Fabian M. Suchanek · 0 citations
Preprint Jul 2026

Cost of Reasoning in non-English Languages: A Case Study on Japanese

Reasoning Language Models (RLMs) achieve their strongest performance when they reason in English, the language for which reasoning-oriented training data is most abundant. However, reasoning trace is a clue for model interpretability and safety, and useful in practice for both the model users and for model developers....

Yuu Jinnai · 1 citation
Preprint Aug 2026

Reasoning about In-Context Samples for Machine-Translation

A novel fragment-based reasoning framework is introduced in which the model first extracts parallel source-target fragments from retrieved similar exemplars, and uses these fragments as intermediate reasoning traces to produce the final translation.

Maxime Bouthors, J. Crego, François Yvon · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.