Skip to content

PipeGNN: A Bandwidth-Efficient GNN Accelerator with Node-Level Pipelined Push Execution

Sep 2026 · ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization (TACO) · 0 citations · 31 references
Advanced Graph Neural Networks

Abstract

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have become a fundamental tool for learning over graph-structured data. Under the message-passing framework, mainstream GNN models alternate between feature transformation and neighborhood aggregation. Fusing these two phases into a node-level pipelined push dataflow, in which each node’s transformed feature streams directly into aggregation, establishes a single-pass I/O target that reads each input tensor exactly once per layer. No existing hardware sustains this dataflow at full concurrency. Prior fusion accelerators fall short of this target in three ways: designs that gather the raw input features for aggregation or write transformed features off-chip incur redundant traffic, designs that stream transformed features on-chip still keep the two phases as separate matrix kernels without a unified execution granularity, and the designs that aggregate at message granularity serialize per-destination aggregation or allocate state that does not scale to large graphs. We propose PipeGNN, a bandwidth-efficient GNN accelerator whose streaming microarchitecture sustains this dataflow as a fully concurrent pipeline within a fixed on-chip buffer budget. PipeGNN decouples execution from topological boundaries by aligning execution granularity with both memory burst size and aggregation compute throughput, and resolves four coupled microarchitectural barriers through coordinated mechanisms: compute-aligned edge batching, contention-aware message reduction, adaptive cross-batch scheduling, and tiered state residency. Evaluated across diverse GNN workloads, PipeGNN achieves geometric mean speedups of 10.1 × over AWB-GCN and 12.2 × over FlowGNN, and 2.4 × to 46.9 × over a GPU baseline across graph scales, reduces off-chip traffic by 2.69 × over AWB-GCN and 5.93 × over FlowGNN, and improves energy efficiency by 56.81 × over AWB-GCN and 1.53 × over FlowGNN, with a 154 × traffic reduction and a 116.81 × energy reduction against HyGCN.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Jul 13, 2026

Verifying Rust cryptography in SymCrypt, from standards to code

Cryptographic code supports vital protections in modern computing systems. Learn how a new method helps verify code as developers write it while preserving speed and adaptability as it gets implemented and evolves. The post Verifying Rust cryptography in SymCrypt, from standards to code appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.