Skip to content

From Reactive Response to Proactive Mitigation: The Value of Precursor Risk Signals in DRL Inventory Control

Sep 2026 · Systems · 25 references
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management Supply Chain and Inventory Management

Abstract

Modern supply chains face abrupt supply disruptions, under which the stable lead time assumption behind conventional inventory control no longer holds. Most replenishment models, including existing deep reinforcement learning (DRL) formulations, act as feedback controllers. A disruption is treated as an unobservable event, and correction begins only after deliveries are already delayed. In practice, however, disruptions are often preceded by observable precursor signals. This paper develops a risk sensing DRL framework that incorporates such signals into the state of a proximal policy optimization (PPO) agent, introducing feedforward control into the replenishment decision. The signal quality (detection rate) and the predictive horizon are treated as explicit design parameters. In a two-echelon system with graded disruptions, the risk sensing policy achieves substantial cost savings against both a per-environment calibrated (s, Q) policy and an identically trained reactive DRL policy, even with an imperfect signal. The required horizon is short, as horizons longer than needed bring no further gain. In contrast, the savings depend critically on the signal quality, as a meaningful gain over the calibrated benchmark requires a signal that detects well over half of upcoming disruptions. The advantage is greatest where severe disruptions are infrequent. The learned policy operates a state-dependent reorder point that stays low in calm conditions and rises with the severity and proximity of a predicted threat. A transparent rule driven by the same signal captures about 83% of the gain, indicating that most of the value comes from the information itself rather than from the learning method. These results quantify the value of advance supply information in inventory control and show how it supports the transition from reactive response to proactive mitigation.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 12, 2026

Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring

StudentSim is a research system for evaluating and improving AI tutoring tools before they are tested with learners. It models how individuals may engage with tutors, giving feedback to improve tutor performance across subjects like chess, writing, and mathematics. The post Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring appeared first on Microsoft Research.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 7, 2026

Discovering the value of humanistic inquiry

Students in MIT’s Concourse program delve deeply into the human condition, debate challenging questions, and learn to develop judgment about issues that can’t be quantified.

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 7, 2026

Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses

Training AI agents with reinforcement learning can be challenging because their tools, context, and decision-making are managed by complex frameworks. Agent Lightning connects existing agents to RL training, making it easier to improve them without rebuilding them. The post Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.