Recent advances in large language models and multimodal foundation models have enabled artificial intelligence agents to jointly process text, images, and other modalities while performing multi-step reasoning and interacting with external tools. Despite this progress, autonomous agents remain prone to compounding errors that originate in visual perception, language reasoning, tool invocation, or the interaction among these components. This paper proposes a self-correcting multimodal agent architecture that couples task decomposition and planning with an explicit verification and revision loop, allowing the agent to detect inconsistencies in intermediate reasoning steps and in final outputs before a task is considered complete. The architecture combines cross-modal evidence aggregation, secondary-model critique, rule-based consistency checks, and tool-grounded verification to identifycandidate errors, and it uses a bounded iterative revision procedure to correct them without unnecessary recomputation. We formalize the verification-and-correction process as a constrained optimization over an evolving action-reasoning trace and describe a concrete algorithmic instantiation suitable for visual question answering, document understanding, and tool-augmented reasoning tasks. We further describe an evaluation protocol spanning accuracy, factual reliability, task completion, and robustness to injected multimodal errors, together with an explicit accounting of the additional inference-time cost introduced by iterative self-correction. The framework is intended to give practitioners a concrete, reproducible template for building and evaluating multimodal agents that can detect and recover from their own mistakes prior to acting autonomously.
The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.
Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· IEEE Transactions on Softwar...· 178 citations· ⚡14
Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.
M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· e-Informatica Software Engin...· 157 citations· ⚡17
This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.
Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 127 citations· ⚡15
The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.
Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 111 citations· ⚡8
The ongoing work building a Raspberry Pi cluster consisting of 300 nodes is presented, with potential use cases being an inexpensive and green test bed for cloud computing research and a robust and mobile data center for operating in adverse environments.
P. Abrahamsson, S. Helmer, Nattakarn Phaphoom et al.· IEEE International Conferenc...· 110 citations· ⚡7
The results indicate that software developers are a slightly happy population, but the need for limiting the unhappiness of developers remains, and 219 factors representing causes of unhappiness while developing software are identified.
D. Graziotin, Fabian Fagerholm, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· International Conference on...· 84 citations· ⚡6
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 8, 2026