This paper proposes and analyzes Comparison-based Preference Optimization (ComPO), a zeroth-order alignment method based on comparison oracles, and establishes a convergence guarantee for its basic offline scheme under smoothness, gradient sparsity, and compatibility between the oracle and a latent objective.
Abstract
Direct preference alignment methods are widely used to align large language models (LLMs) with human preferences because of their computational and memory efficiency. However, likelihood displacement motivates alternative ways to extract information from preference pairs with small likelihood margins. In this paper, we propose and analyze Comparison-based Preference Optimization (ComPO), a zeroth-order alignment method based on comparison oracles. ComPO extracts directional information from these pairs without directly optimizing a differentiable preference loss on them. We establish a convergence guarantee for its basic offline scheme under smoothness, gradient sparsity, and compatibility between the oracle and a latent objective. We further introduce online ComPO, which retains the offline comparison mechanism and uses unlabeled policy generations for reverse-KL control relative to a reference policy. Following the coverage perspective of preference fine-tuning, we establish a performance guarantee for a basic constrained scheme under local coverage and in-distribution pairwise reward accuracy. Experiments on Mistral, Llama, Gemma-2, Qwen3, and Gemma-3 models demonstrate improvements over existing direct alignment methods, including length-controlled win rates, with pair-level diagnostics providing evidence consistent with mitigating likelihood displacement.
This paper formalizes preference privacy, a label-DP-style privacy notion for DPO that protects only the relative preference between candidate responses, assuming an adversary who already knows the prompt and responses, and designs PrivDPO, a DPO variant that enforces preference privacy while remaining compatible with...
Yang-Fan Jiang, Fei Wei, Ergute Bao et al.· 0 citations
This work proposes Distilled Preference Probability Policy Optimization (DP3O), an effective and efficient offline alignment algorithm that outperforms state-of-the-art offline methods, achieves performance comparable to iterative DPO, and reduces training time, demonstrating both its effectiveness and efficiency.
Wen-Bo Zhang, Wen-Zhuo Zhou, Heng-Rui Cai et al.· 0 citations
Personalizing large language models (LLMs) requires aligning generation behavior with user-specific preferences rather than aggregate quality. While Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) provides a stable framework for preference learning, its effectiveness in personalized settings critically depends on how preference p...
Ruo-Ming Jin, Xin-Yu Li, Hao Zhou et al.· 0 citations
AlignDiff, a preference data filtering framework driven by intrinsic model signals, first identifies samples with clear preferences using both positive and inverse signals, then prioritizes the more challenging samples based on the average negative log-likelihood gap, encouraging the model to learn richer information f...
This paper proposes BALIGN, a balanced data selection strategy that explicitly mitigates catastrophic forgetting while optimizing alignment efficacy, and identifies three key data-centric features that dictate parameter drift: the reference model's log-probability margin, the token length between chosen and rejected re...
Minsu Kim, Jian-Xun Lian, Xing Xie et al.· 0 citations
This work proposes DOTA, a data selection framework that minimizes the cost of generating preference data, while still ensuring the quality of training, and proposes a theoretically grounded metric called Preference Perplexity (PFP) that enables it to design a low cost, gradient-based method to effectively estimate the...
Chi Zhang, Jia-Chen T. Wang, Kun He et al.· Proceedings of the VLDB Endo...· 0 citations