Jun 2026· Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment· 0 citations· 63 references
TL;DR
This work proposes DOTA, a data selection framework that minimizes the cost of generating preference data, while still ensuring the quality of training, and proposes a theoretically grounded metric called Preference Perplexity (PFP) that enables it to design a low cost, gradient-based method to effectively estimate the contribution of each preference data point to model performance.
Abstract
In recent years, online Direct Alignment from Preferences (DAP) has emerged as a popular alternative for Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) due to its training stability and simplicity. In online DAP, training relies on preference data, each composed of a question and a pair of large language model (LLM) responses. However, annotating preference data, i.e., generating responses for questions, and using these data to train the RLHF model are computationally expensive. To address this, we propose DOTA, a data selection framework that minimizes the cost of generating preference data, while still ensuring the quality of training. First, we propose a theoretically grounded metric called Preference Perplexity (PFP) that enables us to design a low cost, gradient-based method to effectively estimate the contribution of each preference data point to model performance — critical to data selection. Second, rather than first generating responses for all candidate questions and then selecting preference data points by measuring their PFP, we design an iterative end-to-end framework that only has to generate responses for a small subset of questions, without missing valuable data points. Experiments on UltraChat-200k and HH-RLHF across 13 downstream tasks demonstrate that DOTA reduces computation cost by a factor of three on LLaMA-3-8B, Qwen-3-4B, and Qwen-3-1.7B, without compromising training effectiveness.
This paper proposes and analyzes Comparison-based Preference Optimization (ComPO), a zeroth-order alignment method based on comparison oracles, and establishes a convergence guarantee for its basic offline scheme under smoothness, gradient sparsity, and compatibility between the oracle and a latent objective.
Peter Chen, Xi Chen, Wo-Tao Yin et al.· 0 citations
This work proposes Direct Preference Density Alignment: An alternative framework that removes the need for a learned proxy reward model while strictly preserving the benefits of online reinforcement learning, and enables the combination of the online structural grounding of Group Relative Policy Optimization with the t...
Ioannis Stylianou, S. Shepstone, Jon Francombe et al.· 0 citations
This work proposes ABC-Align, leveraging abundant pseudo label signal to minimize variance and applying a lightweight, adaptive correction grounded in the human-labeled subset, and empirically demonstrates that ABC-Align achieves superior performance over prior semi-supervised baselines in a series of experiments on an...
Eric Frankel, Bang-Hua Zhu, Sewoong Oh et al.· 0 citations
AlignDiff, a preference data filtering framework driven by intrinsic model signals, first identifies samples with clear preferences using both positive and inverse signals, then prioritizes the more challenging samples based on the average negative log-likelihood gap, encouraging the model to learn richer information f...
This paper investigates how language models encode preference information in their intermediate representations, finding that activations from chosen and rejected responses form distinct clusters across layers, even in pretrained models.
This work finds that likelihood-trained TPMs can result in failed generations due to overly large corrections to the LM’s logits, and trains TPMs with LM-aligned objectives that better align with the LM token-probability space.
Hanzhang Liu, William Zhao, Zi-Lei Shao et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.