Generative AI (GenAI) has transformed L2 writing, producing human-like prose but often impersonal feedback. This study explores the potential of GenAI–human collaborative feedback, focusing on the first author’s experience as a teaching assistant in a Hong Kong public university’s Bachelor of Education (English language track). Grounded in Ecological Languaging Competencies (ELC) and its affordance framework, this study employs an ethnographic approach informed by narrative inquiry and phenomenology. Data were drawn from Zoom tutoring sessions incorporating interview-style questions to investigate participants’ perspectives and experiences, GenAI-student conversation logs, and final assignments in order to analyze two multilingual students’ GenAI–human-mediated L2 writing processes. Findings are organized around three ELC-informed themes: (1) whole-body sense-making and the meshing of first-order languaging and second-order language; (2) individual languaging agency within a distributed ecosystem; and (3) environmental affordances and functional fit. In both cases, GenAI demonstrates consistent limitations in facilitating the situated, embodied, and affectively attuned dimensions of languaging that effective L2 writing entails. This study makes two contributions: it extends ELC’s affordance network to tertiary-level GenAI–human-mediated L2 writing, and it reconceptualizes writerly authorship as a distributed yet agentively orchestrated practice. Moreover, co-agentic GenAI–human feedback foregrounds ecological embeddedness, writerly agency, and ethical GenAI integration.
Traditional second language (L2) writing instruction and assessment frequently emphasize unaided, timed production, a model that no longer fully represents the communicative realities of AI-mediated contexts. This conceptual article aims to reconceptualize the L2 writing construct for educational settings in which gene...
M. Askari, A. Rahim· Polyglot: Journal of Linguis...· 0 citations
How students and teachers in a Colombian university language program perceived GenAI-supported production was explored and four patterns emerged: GenAI as a rehearsal and revision partner; tension between polished output and language ownership; teacher mediation shifting toward critical language awareness; and the need...
Dionelio Jesus Moreno Villalobos· International Journal of AI...· 0 citations
The overall results suggest that these illustrative findings provide preliminary, context-specific support for the ACTS framework, which can be interpreted as a theoretically grounded response to the “Performance Paradox” in AI-mediated EFL academic writing.
Tuyet-Nhung Thi Nguyen, N. Huynh· Journal of Education and Tra...· 0 citations
A “Dialectical AI-Scaffolding Framework” is proposed designed to shift ChatGPT from a product-generation tool to an intellectual sparring partner, ensuring that GenAI advances rather than compromises critical thinking in ESL pedagogy.
E. Raju, E. Namratha· International Journal of Eng...· 0 citations
This study proposes a process-oriented mediation model in which engagement with GenAI feedback links GenAI writing self-efficacy and writing SRL strategies, and positions feedback engagement as a central self-regulatory mechanism in GenAI-assisted writing.
Jiayun Xue, Mei-Yen Chen· Frontiers in Psychology· 1 citation
The findings indicate that GenAI output became pedagogically consequential through teacher-GenAI-student interaction, specifically through two key interactional phenomena: reorchestrating epistemic authority through group evaluation and enabling creative re-authoring through narrative development.
Xinyi Wang, Kevin W. H. Tai, Chin-Hsi Lin· Language Learning & Tech...· 2 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.