Skip to content

Learning-Guided Planning in Large Dynamic Action Spaces: Budgeted Tree Search for One-to-Many Mobile Charging

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 18 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

LP-BTS is a learning-guided planning architecture that exceeds a deadline heuristic and two source-derived direct-policy reconstructions on every paired scenario, and provides controlled evidence about learning-guided planning in a large, dynamic action space.

Abstract

Many learned sequential decision systems map the current state directly to an action. That shortcut becomes brittle when candidate actions are numerous, geometrically structured, and rebuilt with the state. One-to-many mobile charging makes this setting concrete: with N=250 sensors, the initial state induces about 1,125 candidate charging-stop actions; each chosen stop simultaneously serves its in-range sensors, and the action universe changes as sensors die. LP-BTS is a learning-guided planning architecture: a graph proposal policy concentrates a small candidate support, a learned value critic evaluates leaves, and edge-budgeted PUCT compares short simulated futures before committing an action. Because the policy scores this set without a fixed output head, a single frozen checkpoint covers every evaluated setting, spanning action universes from 736 to 2,813 stops. Matched ablations reveal complementary effects: uniform sampling costs 8.8 survival percentage points, while, with targeted support fixed, PUCT jointly retains 1.4 points (about 3.5 of 250 sensors) and direct policy selection travels 23% farther. On a prospectively specified, sealed 30-scenario confirmatory bank evaluated once, LP-BTS attains the highest observed survival (0.4545) and alive-AUC (0.8031). Its estimated survival advantage over the strongest domain-engineered comparator is +0.0066 (95% CI [-0.0037, +0.0184]), an unresolved difference, while it exceeds a deadline heuristic and two source-derived direct-policy reconstructions on every paired scenario. Both learned rows are trained, source-derived reconstructions of variants reported by Gong et al. In this setting, the results provide controlled evidence about learning-guided planning in a large, dynamic action space.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

HorizonFlow: Variable-Length Planning for Offline Goal-Conditioned RL

Recent advances in generative planning have made trajectory inpainting a promising approach to offline goal-conditioned reinforcement learning. However, these methods typically specify the planning horizon before generating plan content, even though the appropriate horizon depends on the route itself. A horizon that is...

JunHyeok Oh, Zian Jang, Byung-Jun Lee · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

DeliveryGym: An RL Environment for Long-Horizon Embodied Agent Planning with Adaptive Curriculum

Executable environments enable LLM agents to learn from the consequences of their actions. For embodied agents, those consequences extend beyond whether the current task succeeds: completing a delivery can consume the time, energy, or money needed for later work. Learning to plan therefore requires environments that pr...

Haoqiang Kang, Yi-Ming Zhang, Yi-Yang Guo et al. · 2 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

How Much Planning Is Enough? Reducing Search and Computation in World-Model Planning

Visual world models enable goal-directed control through decision-time action search, but their deployment efficiency is often limited by conservatively large planning budgets. We show that competitive task performance can be achieved without agreement with the Full-budget action, that sufficient budgets vary across mo...

Chang-Bai Li, Si-Rui Li, Yi-Chen Yang et al. · 0 citations

AutoCompact: Learning When to Compact Context in Long-Horizon Coding Agents

Coding agents solve repository-level software engineering tasks through long trajectories of code inspection, search, editing, and testing. As a task progresses, earlier exploration becomes stale, so managing context is more than avoiding overflow: an agent must decide when to compact, what working state to preserve, a...

Xuan Zhang, Long-Tao Zheng, Cun-Xiao Du et al. · 2 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

DeepJEPA: Scaling World Models from Within

World-model planners typically scale outward by rolling farther, sampling more trajectories, or optimizing longer, while assigning the same computation to every imagined transition. We show that making every transition uniformly deeper wastes computation and can degrade planning because useful refinement is concentrate...

Zi-Jian Jin, Yun-Bei Zhang, Yuan-Zhe Liu et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 29, 2026

Who we become when we talk to machines

Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.