LARC is presented, which checks a planned trajectory by bisecting only intervals with an inconclusive clearance test, which reduces computation under a shared certificate model, but 27 of 139 sampled-clear trajectories remained uncertified.
Abstract
Discrete trajectory checks can miss collisions between sampled robot states. Reachability-based certification bounds motion between states, but uniform time partitions waste computation where clearance is large. We present lazy adaptive reachability certification (LARC), which checks a planned trajectory by bisecting only intervals with an inconclusive clearance test. For piecewise-cubic Hermite joint trajectories, the method bounds link occupancy using midpoint capsules inflated by exact componentwise speed maxima. Certified intervals covering the trajectory provide continuous-time external-obstacle clearance, subject to geometric containment, static obstacles, and a prescribed margin. On 160 AgileX PIPER trajectories from 80 start-goal pairs, LARC matched all decisions of the fixed-fine baseline at depth nine. It used 20328 interval evaluations (24.8% of baseline work), with a median paired speedup of 10.28x. A separate MoveIt/FCL audit checked 158051 states and detected collisions in 21 direct-interpolation controls, none of which LARC certified. The method reduced computation under a shared certificate model, but 27 of 139 sampled-clear trajectories remained uncertified. The sampled audit cannot independently prove continuous-time clearance.
Hierarchical multi-UAV planning can produce scheduled paths that become unsafe during execution because tracking dynamics, actuator limits, sampling, and communication are not fully represented upstream. We introduce a certificate-guided safe-tracking framework that treats each planned path as a versioned execution con...
Yu-Hua Cong, Xian Zhu, Zhisheng Wang et al.· Drones· 0 citations
CSymPlan is presented, a certified symbolic planning and control framework for high-DOF manipulators with two complementary implementations: an offline implementation that precomputes certified reach-avoid feedback policies for known workspaces; and an online implementation that synthesizes or updates symbolic policies...
Aditya Narendra, Ashok Kumar Saini, M. Anand et al.· 0 citations
Modular robotic systems often separate motion planning from a downstream executor that enforces state-dependent hard constraints. A candidate that is geometrically valid may therefore be incompatible with the executor's available command set. We present a certificate-based candidate-selection framework that constructs...
To avoid collisions, a robot must repeatedly predict where nearby agents may move, usually with an imperfect model of their dynamics. Reachable sets provide such predictions, but computing them when the system matrices themselves are uncertain can become computationally expensive and conservative for frequent replannin...
Autonomous racecars operate at the limits of vehicle dynamics, where small control errors translate into safety-critical behavior and lost performance. Trajectory planners assume perfect tracking and remain blind to execution errors. To guarantee safety, trajectory planners therefore restrict themselves to conservative...
Ann-Kathrin Schwehn, Alexander Langmann, Mattia Piccinini et al.· 0 citations
AI systems increasingly claim to optimize prompts, policies, architectures, plans, tool-use trajectories, reasoning traces, and test-time computation. This paper argues that such claims are underspecified unless they state the region actually reachable by the system that performed the optimization. We introduce Reachab...
W. Shu· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.