Skip to content
Review Open access

Exploiting DNA Damage Tolerance for Precision Oncology

Sep 2026 · Trends in Cancer · 0 citations · 89 references
Medicine

TL;DR

By integrating DDT inhibition with biomarkers like homologous recombination deficiency and tumor mutational burden, this work can drive synthetic lethality, sensitize tumors to genotoxic agents, suppress treatment-induced mutagenesis, and potentially enhance responses to immunotherapy.

Abstract

Unresolved DNA lesions trigger replication stress, forcing cancer cells to hijack DNA damage tolerance (DDT) networks, specifically translesion synthesis (TLS) and template switching, to sustain replication. While DDT prevents lethal fork collapse, error-prone TLS drives mutagenesis, tumor evolution, and chemoresistance/radioresistance. PCNA post-translational modifications dynamically govern pathway selection. Cancer cells exploit this plasticity, creating actionable vulnerabilities like post-replicative ssDNA gaps. Emerging inhibitors targeting TLS polymerases, upstream regulators like USP1, and critical protein-protein interactions offer unprecedented opportunities for precision oncology. By integrating DDT inhibition with biomarkers like homologous recombination deficiency and tumor mutational burden, we can drive synthetic lethality, sensitize tumors to genotoxic agents, suppress treatment-induced mutagenesis, and potentially enhance responses to immunotherapy.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

Expanding Synthetic Lethality in DNA Damage Response-Defective Cancers Through Stress Phenotype-Guided Kinase Targeting

Synthetic lethality has reshaped oncology, particularly in tumours with defects in DNA damage response (DDR) pathways, yet therapeutic strategies centred on canonical DDR targets, including poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein (ATR), checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1) and Wee1 G2 c...

Mirco Masi, Giulia Varignani, A. Cavalli et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Targeting the DNA Damage Response in Cancer

A modular biomarker framework integrating genomic, functional, immune‐context, spatial and dynamic readouts to guide patient selection, treatment adaptation, and precision therapeutic decision‐making is proposed.

Yi-Huan Qiao, B. Kang, Jian Zhang et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Targeting the DNA damage response to reshape the tumor immune microenvironment

This review summarizes the major DDR pathways, their roles in tumor evolution and immune remodeling, and the rationale and limitations of combining DDR-targeted therapies with immunotherapy and discusses biomarker refinement, resistance mechanisms, and future strategies for translating genomic stress into durable antit...

Wenge Li, Xin Yu · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Synthetic lethality and context-selective DNA-damage response dependencies: from genetic vulnerability to pharmacological translation.

Synthetic lethality has established DNA-damage response (DDR) dependencies as a major strategy for precision cancer therapy, exemplified by targeting BRCA1/2 and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP). However, genetic dependency alone does not ensure pharmacological tractability or clinical utility. Emerging targets, incl...

Nayoon Jo, Su-Jin Kang, Jeongeun Kim et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Inhibition of Translesion DNA Synthesis Sensitizes BRCA-Deficient Ovarian Cancer to PARP Inhibitors.

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) exploit synthetic lethality to treat BRCA1/2-mutated ovarian cancer, yet clinical responses are often incomplete and resistance frequently emerges. PARPi exert cytotoxic effects by inhibiting single-strand break repair and trapping PARP on DNA, which impedes replication fo...

Na Li, Kousalya Lavudi, Qian-Yun Ge et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.