Skip to content
#software testing Dataset Open access

Data and Code for: Convergence or divergence? A three-layer quantitative synthesis tests a Scale–Spectrum–Stage framework of plant microbiome responses to stress

Liu, Lele Sheng, Wenyi Guo, Weihua
Sep 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Abstract

This data and code package accompanies the manuscript “Convergence or divergence? A three-layer quantitative synthesis tests a Scale–Spectrum–Stage framework of plant microbiome responses to stress,” by Lele Liu, Wenyi Sheng, Yuhui Wang, Huijia Song, Yaolin Guo, and Weihua Guo. It is organized into data/, scripts/, d_tier/, and si/, and is intended to make the three-layer quantitative synthesis reproducible. The archive uses its own layout rather than the upstream repository structure: files that were under upstream config/, integration/, meta_analysis/, public_reanalysis/, or main_study/ are bundled here under data/ or scripts/. Version 1.0.0 is dated 2026-09-12 and matches the submission to Global Change Biology. The data/ directory contains the unified comparison tables and result files. unified_comparisons.csv holds 151 stress-vs-control comparison units, with key columns including layer, study_id, comparison_id, row_type, kingdom, organ, stage, stress_type, threeS_cell, yi, vi, and in_cell_model. extraction_data.csv is the 59-row three-tier literature extraction table, comprising 55 rows from 17 studies plus 4 focal-study rows. three_layer_table.csv gives M2 per-cell × per-layer estimates, and sensitivity_leave_layer.csv gives M5 leave-one-layer-out refits. three_layer_results.txt is the full M1–M6 console report and is the only copy for six of the nine rows of SI Table S4. The directory also includes predictions_3S.csv, the pre-registered 3S prediction matrix, figure_source/ with per-panel source tables for Figures 2–5, and si/ with regenerated Supporting Information figures. The scripts/ directory contains the full analysis pipeline. build_unified_table.R converts the three layers into the unified 151-unit table; three_layer_analysis.R runs the joint models M1–M6 using metafor and produces all per-cell estimates; 00_fetch_sra.py downloads SRA/ENA data; 02_dispersion_lnrr.R provides shared PERMDISP and lnRRβ bootstrap functions; 03_integrate.R integrates the public reanalysis layer into comparison units; and make_figures_gcb.R reproduces Figures 2–5 and Figures S1–S2 from data/. The d_tier/ directory contains D-tier recomputation inputs for three of five studies: Ning 2020, Wang 2024, and Halo 2026, each with a treatment coding table and VSEARCH script, or the script and its input table where processed data were provided. The remaining D-tier inputs are Bintarti 2022 and Edwards 2025, which must be obtained from their stated external sources. The reproduction chain is designed to run from the distributed package. Running Rscript scripts/three_layer_analysis.R --unified data/unified_comparisons.csv --outdir . reruns the joint models M1–M6 and rewrites three_layer_table.csv, sensitivity_leave_layer.csv, three_layer_results.txt, and the support figures forest_three_layer.png and heatmap_3S_layer.png. Running Rscript scripts/make_figures_gcb.R rebuilds Figures 2–5 and Figures S1–S2. build_unified_table.R rebuilds the 151-unit table from the three layer outputs. D-tier recomputations require downloading FASTQ files, running bash run_vsearch.sh in each study directory, and then running 02_dispersion_lnrr.R over the transposed ASV table; the WangY 2024 entry needs --spectrum F. Primary sequencing data for the common-garden experiment are available at GSA BioProject PRJCA050192. Software requirements are specified by step. Steps 1 and 3 need R with metafor; the models were run under R 4.5.0 with metafor 5.0.1. Step 2 additionally needs ggplot2 4.0.3, patchwork, R’s cairo device, the Liberation Sans font, and pdftoppm from poppler-utils for the 450 dpi JPG previews; the script stops with an explicit error if pdftoppm is missing. Step 4 needs vsearch 2.30.5, python3, and, for the reanalysis layer, vegan. The package is released under CC-BY-4.0; the full text is in LICENSE, the machine-readable citation is in CITATION.cff, and copyright belongs to Lele Liu, Wenyi Sheng, Yuhui Wang, Huijia Song, Yaolin Guo, and Weihua Guo.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Review Mar 2008

Agile methods in European embedded software development organisations: a survey on the actual use and usefulness of Extreme Programming and Scrum

The results show that the embedded industry has been able to apply agile methods in its development processes and that the appreciation of the agile methods and their individual practices appears to increase once adopted and applied in practice.

O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson · 238 citations · ⚡9
#computer vision Open access Jul 2017

What happens when software developers are (un)happy

Consequences of happiness and unhappiness that are beneficial and detrimental for developers' mental well-being, the software development process, and the produced artifacts are found.

D. Graziotin, Fabian Fagerholm, Xiaofeng Wang et al. · 236 citations · ⚡13
#computer vision Open access Oct 2004

Mobile-D: an agile approach for mobile application development

The Mobile-D approach is briefly outlined here and the experiences gained from four case studies are discussed, which helped develop an agile development approach for mobile application development.

P. Abrahamsson, Antti Hanhineva, H. Hulkko et al. · 225 citations · ⚡18

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 12, 2026

Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring

StudentSim is a research system for evaluating and improving AI tutoring tools before they are tested with learners. It models how individuals may engage with tutors, giving feedback to improve tutor performance across subjects like chess, writing, and mathematics. The post Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring appeared first on Microsoft Research.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 2, 2026

Documenting the tech worker movement

Writing as a participant and researcher, PhD student JS Tan SM ’22 has co-authored a new book about the rise of tech worker protests and the employer backlash that followed.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 2, 2026

Documenting the tech worker movement

Writing as a participant and researcher, PhD student JS Tan SM ’22 has co-authored a new book about the rise of tech worker protests and the employer backlash that followed.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.