Aug 2026· Sustainability Science· 0 citations· 49 references
Abstract
Collaboration across the ‘siloes’ of government is key to unlocking a transformative paradigm shift in climate change adaptation (CCA), yet such ‘mainstreaming’ efforts have been unsuccessful to date. This paper argues that these shortcomings are rooted primarily in the mainstreaming literature’s neglect of people’s worldviews as an integral component of successful collaboration. For an individual’s internal dimensions to be recognized alongside disciplinary knowledge requires inclusiveness and expansiveness in both organizational spaces and in people. This paper presents a novel framework aiming to facilitate inclusiveness and expansiveness in both areas: the CCA Worldview Map. The CCA Worldview Map unpacks the idea of transformation into five dimensions, each with three levels of complexity, which represent distinct phases of the public planning process: When and What, relating to the input; Who, relating to the process; How, relating to the output; and Why, relating to the outcomes and impact. Using interview data from sixteen managers and practitioners at the local government level across Norway, I show how the CCA Worldview Map can be used to map understandings of CCA, unearthing a plurality of worldviews within Norwegian public administration. I discuss the framework’s utility along three lines: as a vocabulary for articulating differing interpretations of CCA and their relationships, thus identifying complementarity instead of conflict; as a tool that consolidates a breadth of ideas from the CCA literature into a single framework; and as an aid in uncovering cognitive dissonance and expanding personal transformative awareness.
What is new?
As financial pressures intensify and research becomes more complex and interdependent, universities are increasingly prioritising collaborative work within and beyond academia. This shift has revealed a significant gap in co-production and collaboration and a critical need for professional support in ide...
Helen Elizabeth Bryant, Alys Kay· Journal of Research Manageme...· 0 citations
In commons and institutional research, the Institutional Analysis and Development framework (IADF) has proven itself as a useful tool to investigate the complexities of social-environmental systems. It is effective in guiding researchers through the process of understanding complex problem situations. The framework hel...
Iasc-Ecn Power Collective, Désirée Schwindenhammer, Lavanya Suresh et al.· International Journal of the...· 0 citations
This paper examines how new policy concepts are taken up in practice, focusing on the Circular Economy of Water (CEW) in the Netherlands. Drawing on 20 semi-structured interviews with practitioners from different governance levels, regions, and sectors, we analyze how CEW is interpreted, reshaped, and mainstreamed into...
Noelle M C G Lasseur, D. Beukers, K. Holstead et al.· Ambio· 0 citations
A systematic literature review of 125 peer-reviewed articles published between 2021 and 2026 to synthesise contemporary public-sector DT dynamics indicates that DT is predominantly conceptualised as a sociotechnical and public-value-oriented process shaped primarily by leadership, organisational culture and strategic a...
Objectives: This study examines INA-DIGITAL as a flagship initiative for Indonesia’s Collaborative Digital Transformation (CDT) toward 2045, aiming to understand how multi-stakeholder collaboration, technological readiness, and citizen-centric principles shape digital governance. Prior work: Grounded in CDT theory, whi...
Rio Yusri Maulana, A. Sutan, Aditya Romadhon et al.· Journal· 0 citations
By attending to the broader historical and societal contexts that shape organizational members’ interpretations of diversity management, embedded sensemaking analysis surfaces context-specific tensions that may otherwise remain hidden. The study proposes a methodological strategy that combines cue interpretation, stanc...