Skip to content

Listen, Do Not Copy: Internalizing Audio-Grounded Scaffold Context for Robust Omni-Model Speech Understanding

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.21943 · 0 citations · 31 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

A joint GDPO task in which the model learns when to use a clue and how to produce a speaker-attributed transcript from separately normalized format, gate, and transcript rewards is formulated.

Abstract

Omni models transcribe clean, single-speaker speech well, but their accuracy drops sharply when speakers overlap and the scene is noisy, exactly where knowing who said what matters most. A natural fix is a short scene description. We show why this is risky: answer-bearing text lets the model copy instead of listen, so the score rises although nothing has been heard; a silent test exposes this shortcut at once. We call this failure mode perception bypass and address it with Audio-Grounded Scaffold Context (AGSC). AGSC links three steps: first, we build clues from audio to guide listening without giving the answer; second, answer-overlap and silence tests probe them for leakage and audio dependence; finally, those clues scaffold training but vanish at test time, yielding no-clue capability. Across three heterogeneous Omni models, training on AGSC lowers no-clue capped mean permutation word error rate (mpWER) on overlapping, noisy speech from 25%-71% to 9%-15%. For streaming control, we formulate a joint GDPO task in which the model learns when to use a clue and how to produce a speaker-attributed transcript from separately normalized format, gate, and transcript rewards. After internalization, AGSC adds almost no inference overhead.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Heard but Not Heeded: Paralinguistic Information Encoding and Loss in Audio-Language Models

A mechanistic analysis of paralinguistic information in four open source models using the Expresso dataset with controlled speaking styles identifies a gap between what models encode and what they use, highlighting a key limitation in current audio language models.

Bhuvan Koduru, Dareen Alharthi, Rita Singh et al. · 3 citations · ⚡1
Preprint Sep 2026

AudioICL-Bench: A Benchmark for Large Audio Language Model In-Context Learning

AudioICL-Bench is introduced, a diagnostic benchmark whose per-episode rules are resampled so that no correct answer is recoverable from prior knowledge, and its nine tasks are organized along two axes that separate what must be learned from demonstrations from what must be perceived in the signal, enabling failures to...

Jia-Hung Chen, Yi-Cheng Lin, Kai-Wei Chang et al. · 0 citations
Book Open access Oct 2026

Backchannel-Aware Transcription for Multiparty Conversation: ASR Omissions, Acoustic Recovery, and Cross-Corpus Transfer

Collective-state research increasingly treats automatic transcripts as a substitute for raw audio. We show this is not free under one widely used pipeline: WhisperX omits approximately 48% of hand-labeled backchannels (“mm-hmm”, “yeah”) in close-talk multi-party recordings, and the omission replicates across held-out r...

Shan Ahmed Shaffi, M. J. Seikavandi, Anna Obara et al. · 1 citation
Preprint Sep 2026

What Did I Just Say? Self-Listening for Full-Duplex Speech Models

Full-duplex spoken language models can listen and speak simultaneously, enabling them to handle interruptions and backchannels in human conversation. However, text generation, speech synthesis, and audio playback proceed asynchronously. As a result, what a model believes it has said may not match what has actually been...

Xuan-Ning Zhou, Junyi Ao, Xiao-Tong Liu et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.