Oct 2026· Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 29th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems· 0 citations· 21 references
Abstract
Model-driven engineering (MDE) excels at ensuring architectural consistency and managing complexity, yet extending generated code skeletons with project-specific business logic often remains a time-consuming manual task. Conversely, large language models (LLMs) offer immense flexibility in coding but may produce vibe-coded results—software that looks correct but fails to adhere to intended architectures and implicit requirements. An open challenge lies in harnessing the adaptability of LLMs to handle implementation details without sacrificing the deterministic correctness of the MDE scaffolding. Previous attempts have largely relied on unconstrained coding assistants or required a human in the loop for interacting with the LLM. To overcome this, we introduce Agentic Gap Filling, a hybrid pipeline where LLM prompts are embedded directly within the model to drive the generation of code skeletons. The generated code contains protected TODO regions, which LLM agents subsequently resolve and a jury of LLM review agents and separate testing agents immediately validate. We integrate this approach into the MontiThings framework, demonstrating a workflow where models define the architecture of a project while artificial intelligence (AI) agents act as developers and reviewers, filling in the logic. This synergy ensures the structural integrity of the generated system while providing the flexibility of LLMs to adapt to various domain requirements. Our evaluation across 32 test configurations demonstrates that this multiagent workflow achieves up to 93.21% functional accuracy after four iterations, while preserving the structural integrity of the generated system.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The results show that the embedded industry has been able to apply agile methods in its development processes and that the appreciation of the agile methods and their individual practices appears to increase once adopted and applied in practice.
O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· IET Software· 238 citations· ⚡9
Consequences of happiness and unhappiness that are beneficial and detrimental for developers' mental well-being, the software development process, and the produced artifacts are found.
D. Graziotin, Fabian Fagerholm, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 236 citations· ⚡13
The Mobile-D approach is briefly outlined here and the experiences gained from four case studies are discussed, which helped develop an agile development approach for mobile application development.
P. Abrahamsson, Antti Hanhineva, H. Hulkko et al.· Conference on Object-Oriente...· 225 citations· ⚡18