Back to #software testing

Surf_2_Volume: a workflow for converting CIFTI parcellations to NIfTI volume space

Shu-Guang Yang Zi-Yi Wang Yu-Jing Shen Jun-Yi Li Yuxia Nie Fei-Zhen Cao Sui-Ping Wang
Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 14 references
Biology

TL;DR

Surf_2_Volume is presented, a workflow that combines Connectome Workbench, FreeSurfer, AFNI, AFNI, neuromaps, and Python image processing to convert cortical and subcortical CIFTI parcellations into Neuroimaging Informatics Technology Initiative (NIfTI) volumes.

Abstract

Parcellations distributed in Connectivity Informatics Technology Initiative (CIFTI) format cannot be used directly in many analysis programs that require volume input. Existing conversion options may leave voxels in cortical gray matter unlabeled or assign labels outside gray matter, depending on the mapping parameters. We present Surf_2_Volume, a workflow that combines Connectome Workbench, FreeSurfer, AFNI, neuromaps, and Python image processing to convert cortical and subcortical CIFTI parcellations into Neuroimaging Informatics Technology Initiative (NIfTI) volumes. The workflow separates cortical and subcortical components, transfers cortical labels through fsaverage and a surface representation of the target MNI152 template, restricts voxel assignment using an adjustable probability threshold for gray matter, and recombines the components. Using the Cole-Anticevic Brain-wide Network Partition, Surf_2_Volume had an adjusted Dice score of 0.776, compared with a maximum of 0.637 among the evaluated Connectome Workbench settings. In a separate test using the Schaefer 2018 17-network volume atlas, the scores were 0.727 for Surf_2_Volume and 0.535 for the best Workbench setting. Across both atlas evaluations, Surf_2_Volume had higher adjusted Dice scores than the evaluated Workbench settings. The workflow provides a way to use surface parcellations in software that requires NIfTI input while allowing explicit control over gray matter coverage.

View source

Similar papers

#software testing Preprint Aug 2026

Evaluating Inference-Time Defenses Against Package Hallucination in LLM-Generated Code

LLMs are increasingly used for code generation, yet they frequently hallucinate non-existent software packages, creating exploitable entry points into the software supply chain. We make four contributions to this problem. First, we show that prior evaluation methodologies systematically inflate hallucination rates by misclassifying standard-library modules as hallucinations in some languages. For Python, the overestimation reaches 9.4 percentage points. Second, we evaluate seven inference-time defenses for mitigating package hallucinations, including five guided decoding strategies (Greedy, Contrastive, DoLa, Nudging, and Active Layer-Contrastive Decoding), an iterative self-refinement approach (Self-Refine), and a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)-based defense.. Across eight models spanning five families and four programming languages (Python, JavaScript, Ruby, Rust), RAG reduces the package hallucination rate (PHR) in 18 of 32 model--language configurations. Third, we introduce Package Utility (PU) to assess whether defenses preserve valid and task-relevant recommendations. Among strategies evaluated, Greedy decoding provides the strongest average mitigation--utility trade-off. Fourth, we stress-test all strategies under adversarial prompts seeded with fabricated package names and find that PHR surges by up to 45 percentage points relative to standard prompts, with Ruby consistently the most vulnerable language (80.9--95.2\%). Under adversarial conditions, RAG and Self-Refine outperform all decoding-only strategies, indicating that robust defense requires either external grounding or iterative self-verification when prompts are actively hostile. Our results recast package hallucination as both a measurement problem and a decoding-time control problem, and they demonstrate that the choice of defense must be matched to the threat model and recommendation utility.

Albérick Euraste Djiré, Iyiola E. Olatunji, Melissa Tessa et al. · 1 citation
#software testing Review Aug 2026

Model-Based Agentic Software Engineering

MAGE explains how externalized knowledge, bounded action, independent evaluation, and retained human authority can compose into a governed engineering environment, and proposes tests of when that environment turns commodity intelligence into durable engineering progress.

James C. Davis, Kelechi G. Kalu, Huiyun Peng et al. · 1 citation
#software testing Preprint Aug 2026

DSA: Evidence-Aware LLM-Agent Orchestration for Multi-Market Stock Research

DSA is presented, an evidence-aware orchestration framework for multi-market stock research with large language model (LLM) agents that establishes implementation conformance for the tested software contracts, not superior report quality, forecasting accuracy, or investment returns.

Lin-Sen Zhu, Yirui Shi · 0 citations

Mixed Reality Glasses Image Translocation for Binocular Diplopia.

This prototype MRG image translocation software was helpful to 69% of patients with binocular diplopia, but limited by large angle strabismus because of the limited instrument field of view.

Edsel B Ing, Kevin Sha, Sarosh Dandoti et al. · 0 citations
#software testing Open access Aug 2026

Multi-Disease Prediction Using Machine Learning: A Web-Based Diagnostic Support System for Diabetes, Heart Disease, and Parkinson\'s Disease

A diagnostic support system based on a unified web platform that classifies patients according to the risks of developing three diseases based on regularly collected clinical or audio data using classical supervised learning algorithms is presented.

Vedamurthy D R, Dr. Anup Ritti, A. Bibi et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Aug 17, 2026

Q&A: Rethinking how innovation happens

In his latest book, Professor Eugene Fitzgerald examines the forces that turn breakthroughs into value — and why innovation resists simple formulas.