This work proposes Ecdysis, which aggregates failure evidence across task instances before promoting recurring failure patterns into persistent harness evolution, biasing evolution toward repairs that are more likely to generalize beyond individual model behaviors.
Abstract
Self-evolving runtime harnesses can substantially improve the capabilities of large language model (LLM) agents and provide a promising paradigm for optimizing agent execution. Existing failure-driven approaches often treat observed agent failures as direct evidence for harness modification. A key challenge in failure-driven harness evolution is that observed failures can reflect either limitations of the underlying model or systematic deficiencies of the harness. Directly optimizing against individual failures can therefore induce model-specific accommodation and impair generalization across tasks and models. We study whether failure evidence accumulated across task instances can provide a more reliable signal for harness training. Our key insight is that failures recurring across distinct tasks provide stronger inductive evidence for systematic harness deficiencies than isolated failures. Based on this insight, we propose Ecdysis, which aggregates failure evidence across task instances before promoting recurring failure patterns into persistent harness evolution, biasing evolution toward repairs that are more likely to generalize beyond individual model behaviors. Ecdysis further employs collaborative failure analysis to refine modification specifications, trading additional evolution-time reasoning for improved modification quality. Across multiple LLMs and benchmarks, Ecdysis improves the reasoning accuracy of evolved harnesses by 18.56% over existing harness evolution while achieving up to 1.84x faster harness training. Ecdysis also enables more data-efficient training. Fine-grained analysis shows that Ecdysis reduces model-specific accommodation during evolution, while the resulting harnesses exhibit stronger cross-LLM generalization and lower inference-time token consumption.
Evo-Bench is the first benchmark designed to evaluate models'intrinsic harness-evolving capabilities across Search, Office, and General agent domains, and exposes critical temporal anomalies like early saturation, while demonstrating that the synthesized harnesses act as highly transferable reasoning structures, consis...
The proposed AutoSaddler, an automatic harness optimization framework that formulates harness improvement as an offline learning problem and iteratively updates the harness using failure signals from mini-batches, suggests that automatic harness optimization is a promising path toward more performant and reliable agent...
Sungho Park, Wonjoong Kim, Rongyuan Tan et al.· 17 citations· ⚡1
HarnessLens is introduced, a budget-aware framework for automated harness evolution that jointly explores the task space and user-configurable components, derives candidate modifications from execution trajectories, and selectively verifies each candidate on behavior-relevant tasks using an attributable-evidence gate.
EvoSafeHarness is a safety-specific optimization framework that synthesizes a deployable harness for a frozen model in a target domain, guided by model behavior, domain specifications, and fresh-context adversarial review to reject benchmark-specific rules.
Nanxi Li, Ying-Zi Ma, Yu-Long Cao et al.· 4 citations· ⚡1
EvoHarnessBench is introduced, a benchmark for evaluating agents under controlled harness evolution across three axes (tools, skills, and agents), and establishes harness evolution as a distinct challenge for building agents that can keep pace with an evolving harness while preserving previously effective behavior.
Zi-Xuan Ke, Vaidehi Patil, Hai-Zhou Shi et al.· 5 citations· ⚡1
V Vestrum, a framework that turns failures in execution traces into scoped harness changes without training the task model, is introduced, a framework that turns failures in execution traces into scoped harness changes without training the task model.
Jayant Parashar, Eugene F. Douglass, William C. Bastian et al.· 0 citations