Back to #generative ai

Evaluating the Accuracy, Empathy, and Readability of Generative AI Versus Registered Nurses in Discharge Planning: A Vignette-Based Study.

Yi-Ke Wang Meiyan Ji Xing-Hua Bai Yuan Zhuang
Sep 2026 · Nursing Open · Vol 13 9, pp. e70777 · 0 citations
Medicine

TL;DR

While artificial intelligence produced more comprehensive information, it generated clinically unsafe content and scored significantly lower than nurses in empathy and readability, and healthcare organizations should establish protocols requiring nurse verification of all artificial intelligence-generated discharge content.

View source

Similar papers

#generative ai Open access Sep 2026

The socio-ecological costs of AI: Toward socially responsible and sustainable communication practices

The adoption of generative artificial intelligence among communication practitioners and researchers surged after the launch of ChatGPT in November 2022, urging practitioners to critically engage in exploring pathways for fostering socially responsible and environmentally sustainable AI practices.

Emma Christensen · 4 citations · ⚡1
#generative ai Review Open access Sep 2026

Toward an AI-integrated nursing curriculum: A Kano model analysis of generative AI competency needs.

Clinical nurses' GenAI learning needs are currently oriented toward practical, application-focused skills, and curriculum development may benefit from a phased approach that prioritizes high-impact practical skills while progressively incorporating foundational, ethical, and advanced competencies.

Yeru Xia, Jingbang Liu, Kaili Wang et al. · 1 citation · ⚡1
#generative ai Aug 2026

AI and Bullshit

It is argued that both AI and bullshitters are untrustworthy informants, and for similar reasons, it is natural to describe AI’s informational outputs as bullshit, as it signals their distinctive kind of epistemic deficiencies, which they share with bullshit.

Duncan Pritchard · 1 citation

Related blog posts