Aug 2026· AI and Data Science Journal· Vol 3, pp. 1-13· 0 citations· 50 references
TL;DR
This paper proposes a conceptual framework for distributed, AI-assisted risk assessment designed to address the gap between conventional vulnerability management and distributed systems, and outlines key open challenges— data, robustness, performance, consistency, explainability, and evaluation.
Abstract
Microservice and cloud-native architectures have expanded the software attack surface at a pace that outstrips the adaptation of traditional risk assessment methods. Conventional vulnerability management remains centralized, static, severity-oriented, and disconnected from access control—characteristics that are ill-suited to distributed systems, where risk is shaped more by context and connectivity than by isolated weaknesses. This paper proposes a conceptual framework for distributed, AI-assisted risk assessment designed to address this gap. The framework synthesizes four bodies of literature—zero-trust architecture, microservice and cloud-native security, vulnerability analytics, and software risk management—and identifies precisely where each falls short. A six-dimensional taxonomy then structures the design space of distributed risk assessment, classifying approaches by signal source, granularity, analytical technique, risk model, zero-trust integration point, and temporality, and revealing a combination not yet explored by existing work. To fill this void, the paper introduces a four-layer framework: lightweight per-service agents collect multi-source evidence; AI-assisted analytics estimate exploit likelihood and detect anomalies; a graph-aware aggregation layer propagates risk across the service dependency graph; and an integration layer supplies a continuous per-service risk score to the zero-trust policy engine. An illustrative scenario demonstrates how a contextually significant but low-severity vulnerability would be surfaced and contained. As a conceptual contribution without experimental validation, the paper concludes by outlining key open challenges—data, robustness, performance, consistency, explainability, and evaluation—that must be addressed before the framework can be operationalized.
Background: The traditional model of network perimeter, where traffic within organizational borders may be trusted, is structurally incapable of cloud-oriented and distributed enterprise systems. Combined with containerized microservices, multi-cloud implementation, remote work, and interconnectedness of supply chains...
Asker Shariff Subahan, S. Ramamoorthy, Manikandan Mylsamy et al.· 2026 International Conferenc...· 0 citations
A snapshot of the literature review of the threat modeling for composable architectures is offered, why automation is difficult in this context is shown, and an automation framework to allocate scarce resources according to risk exposure to composable architecture components is proposed.
Liviu-Mihai Popescu, R. Brad· Future Internet· 0 citations
Using a continuous verification mechanism as part of ZTA implementation can help reduce lateral movement incidents by as much as 72-90% and insider threats by 65%.
Moamin Hajo, Karam Hatim· Al-Noor Journal of Engineeri...· 0 citations
Evidence concentrates on prompt/reasoning, memory, and tool-mediated attacks, predominantly in single-agent settings, within the selected studies, to guide more systematic, architecture-aware, and reproducible security evaluation of agentic AI.
Heewon Baek, Alsharif Abuadbba, Kristen Moore et al.· 0 citations
This paper synthesizes reported evidence on ZTA across three research questions: effectiveness relative to perimeter models, the implementation challenges enterprises face, and the security contribution of individual components.
Md Shahnawaj, Hamim Islam Hellol, Debabrata Biswas et al.· Journal of Computers, Mechan...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.