Skip to content

Author

Xiongsheng Yi

1 paper indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access Aug 2026

DISTRIBUTED AI-ASSISTED RISK ASSESSMENT FOR ZERO-TRUST MICROSERVICES: A TAXONOMY AND CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK

Microservice and cloud-native architectures have expanded the software attack surface at a pace that outstrips the adaptation of traditional risk assessment methods. Conventional vulnerability management remains centralized, static, severity-oriented, and disconnected from access control—characteristics that are ill-suited to distributed systems, where risk is shaped more by context and connectivity than by isolated weaknesses. This paper proposes a conceptual framework for distributed, AI-assisted risk assessment designed to address this gap. The framework synthesizes four bodies of literature—zero-trust architecture, microservice and cloud-native security, vulnerability analytics, and software risk management—and identifies precisely where each falls short. A six-dimensional taxonomy then structures the design space of distributed risk assessment, classifying approaches by signal source, granularity, analytical technique, risk model, zero-trust integration point, and temporality, and revealing a combination not yet explored by existing work. To fill this void, the paper introduces a four-layer framework: lightweight per-service agents collect multi-source evidence; AI-assisted analytics estimate exploit likelihood and detect anomalies; a graph-aware aggregation layer propagates risk across the service dependency graph; and an integration layer supplies a continuous per-service risk score to the zero-trust policy engine. An illustrative scenario demonstrates how a contextually significant but low-severity vulnerability would be surfaced and contained. As a conceptual contribution without experimental validation, the paper concludes by outlining key open challenges—data, robustness, performance, consistency, explainability, and evaluation—that must be addressed before the framework can be operationalized.

Daoquan Zhou, Xiongsheng Yi · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.